Beyond Born–Oppenheimer theory for spectroscopic and scattering processes
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We review our development on beyond Born–Oppenheimer (BBO) theory and its implementation on various models and realistic molecular processes as carried out over the last 15 years. The theoretical formulation leading to the BBO equations are thoroughly discussed with ab initio calculations. We have employed first principle based BBO theory not only to formulate single surface extended Born–Oppenheimer equation to understand the nature of nonadiabatic effect but also to construct accurate diabatic potential energy surfaces (PESs) for important spectroscopic systems, namely, NO2 radical, Na3 and K3 clusters, NO3 radical, benzene and 1,3,5-trifluorobenzene radical cations (C6H6+ and C6H3F3+) as well as triatomic reactive scattering systems like H++H2 and F+H2. The nonadiabatic phenomena like Jahn–Teller (JT), Renner–Teller, pseudo Jahn–Teller effects and the accidental conical intersections are the key players in dictating spectroscopic and reactive scattering profiles. The nature of diabatic coupling elements derived from ab initio data with BBO theory for molecular processes in Franck-Condon region has been analysed in the context of linearly and bilinearly coupled JT model Hamiltonian. The results obtained from quantum dynamical calculations on BBO based diabatic PESs of the above molecular systems are found to be in accord with available experimental outcomes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it