Large DNA virus promoted the endosymbiotic evolution to make a photosynthetic eukaryote
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Chloroplasts in photosynthetic eukaryotes originated from a cyanobacterial endosymbiosis far more than 1 billion years ago 1-3 . Due to this ancientness, it remains unclear how this evolutionary process proceeded. To unveil this mystery, we analysed the whole genome sequence of a photosynthetic rhizarian amoeba 4 , Paulinella micropora 5,6 , which has a chloroplast-like organelle that originated from another cyanobacterial endosymbiosis 7-10 about 0.1 billion years ago 11 . Here we show that the predacious amoeba that engulfed cyanobacteria evolved into a photosynthetic organism very quickly in the evolutionary time scale, probably aided by the drastic genome reorganization activated by large DNA virus. In the endosymbiotic evolution of eukaryotic cells, gene transfer from the endosymbiont genome to the host nucleus is essential for the evolving host cell to control the endosymbiont-derived organelle 12 . In P. micropora , we found that the gene transfer from the free-living and endosymbiotic bacteria to the amoeba nucleus was rapidly activated but both simultaneously ceased within the initiation period of the endosymbiotic evolution, suggesting that the genome reorganization drastically proceeded and completed. During this period, large DNA virus appeared to have infected the amoeba, followed by the rapid amplification and diversification of virus-related genes. These findings led us to re-examine the conventional endosymbiotic evolutionary scenario that exclusively deals with the host and the symbiont, and to extend it by incorporating a third critical player, large DNA virus, which activates the drastic gene transfer and genome reorganization between them. This Paulinella version of the evolutionary hypothesis deserves further testing of its generality in evolutionary systems and could shed light on the unknown roles of large DNA viruses 13 in the evolution of terrestrial life.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".