MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

The Risk of Malignancy Following Idiopathic Venous Thromboembolism: A Population-Based Cohort Study

2011· article· en· W2981197296 on OpenAlexaffabout
Dimple Kondal, Susan R. Kahn, Vicky Tagalakis

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicVenous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
Canadian institutionsJewish General Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePulmonary embolismCancerDeep veinMalignancyPopulationCohortInternal medicineThrombosisVenous thrombosisMedical recordLung cancerPediatricsCancer registrySurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Abstract 5255 Background: Venous thromboembolism (VTE), encompassing deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE), can be the earliest manifestation of an occult malignancy. Objectives: We used the hospital discharge (MED ECHO) database of the province of Quebec, Canada to determine the risk of a new cancer diagnosis in patients with idiopathic VTE. Methods: Using data from Med-Echo which systematically records information on all hospital admissions in Quebec, we constructed a cohort of all individuals with a first-time diagnosis of DVT or PE between January 1, 1996 and December 31, 2004 and no cancer diagnosis preceding the VTE. Subjects were excluded if there was a surgical procedure, pregnancy, trauma or hospitalization in the 3 months prior to the VTE. Subjects were followed for 12 months after VTE for a first diagnosis of cancer (except non-melanoma skin cancer). VTE and cancer were defined using the 9th edition International Classification of Diseases codes. Results: In all, 20 740 patients with idiopathic VTE and without previous cancer were identified. The mean age was 65.9 years (SD 12.6) and 58% were female. Overall, 696 (3.4%) patients were diagnosed with cancer in the 12 months following VTE. The risk was lowest among subjects aged 50 years or less (1.0%) and highest among patients aged 80 years or more (5.5%). Lung (25%) and gastrointestinal tumours (21%) were the most common diagnoses. Conclusions: In this large population of patients with idiopathic VTE we found that 3.4% of patients were diagnosed with cancer in the first year following VTE, and that older patients had a higher risk of cancer compared to younger patients. This risk is less than previously reported estimates of 4–12%. The value of occult cancer screening in patients with idiopathic VTE is uncertain. Disclosures: Tagalakis: Sanofi Aventis: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.329
Threshold uncertainty score0.655

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBlood→Same topicVenous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management→French-language works237,207→