MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2981327898

White Nose Syndrome in Bats: Study 2: (Shelley) Inhibition of White Nose Syndrome in Hibernating Bat Colonies:Identification of Antifungal Agents

2018· article· W2981327898 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Virginia Shelley

Bibliographic record

VenueMurray State's Digital Commons (Murray State University) · 2018
Typearticle
Language
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicRabies epidemiology and control
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNoseWhite (mutation)AntifungalBiologyIdentification (biology)EcologyAnatomyMicrobiologyBiochemistry
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Since it first appeared in 2006, White-Nose Syndrome (WNS) has been devastating bat populations in caves across Northeastern US. Caused by the fungus Geomyces destructans, WNS has spread into caves as far west as Oklahoma and as far north as Canada, with over 115 cave hibernacula are now affected. To reduce the spread of this pathogen and protect endangered bat species, we are looking for compounds that can be used to treat bats in situ. We have focused on testing natural organic compounds that are able to prevent the growth and further transmittance of G. destructans, without harming bats or the native cave ecology. Various compounds have been tested to prevent the growth of the closely related Geomyces pannorum using two different competition assays: 1) a disk diffusion assay; and 2) a direct application of the chemical solution. In order to specifically target Geomyces species, the same tests were also performed using the unrelated fungi Penicillium pinophiolium and Aspergillus brasiliensis. Our results suggest that a number of compounds have the potential to prevent the spread of WNS and are currently being tested on the pathogen G. destructans and on healthy bat populations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMurray State's Digital Commons (Murray State University)Same topicRabies epidemiology and controlFrench-language works237,207