MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2981379154 · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehz748.0300

P1538Low energy intake predicts readmission of elderly heart failure patients independently of nutritional status

2019· article· en· W2981379154 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Kanako Shimomura, Satoshi Katano, Toshiyuki Yano, K Ohori, Suguru Honma, Ayako Watanabe, Tomoyuki Ishigo, Takefumi Fujito, Nobutaka Nagano, Masayuki Koyama, Hidemichi Kouzu, Akiyoshi Hashimoto, Tetsuji Miura

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Heart Journal · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNutrition and Health in Aging
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineInterquartile rangeHeart failureMyocardial infarctionCanadian Cardiovascular SocietyClinical endpointInternal medicineMedical recordAnginaMalnutritionCardiologyPhysical therapyClinical trial

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Malnutrition is frequently present and closely associated with poor clinical outcomes in elderly heart failure (HF) patients. Our previous study showed that low energy intake (EI) is associated with worse functional status in elderly HF inpatients after cardiac rehabilitation, but significance of EI in prediction of hospital readmission has not been elucidated fully. Purpose We examined whether low EI is a predictor of readmission for cardiac events in elderly HF patients. Methods We retrospectively retrieved data for 298 HF patients aged ≥65 years (median age of 77 years, interquartile range [IQR]: 71 - 82, female: 53%) who admitted to our institute for diagnosis and treatment of HF. Medical records were reviewed with regard to demography, medical history, comorbidities, medications, laboratory data, echocardiograms, functional status, nutritional status and total energy intake. Nutritional status was assessed using the Mini Nutritional Assessment Short Form (MNA-SF) and total EI per day were calculated at discharge by a registered dietitian and a trained physical therapist. The primary endpoint was readmission due to cardiovascular events including worsening HF, arrhythmia, angina pectoris and myocardial infarction during a 1-year follow-up period. Results The median period of follow-up was 235 days (IQR: 78–365 days). The 1-year readmission rate for cardiovascular events was 54.4%. The cutoff values of MNA-SF score and EI, calculated by ROC curve analysis to predict the primary endpoint, were 7 points (area under the curve [AUC]: 0.59, sensitivity: 0.65, specificity: 0.50) and 31.8 kcal/kg/day (AUC: 0.59, sensitivity: 0.83, specificity: 0.35), respectively. Patients with low MNF-SF score (≤7) or low EI (≤31.8 kcal/kg/day) had significantly higher readmission rate during a 1-year follow-up period than did the patients with high MNF-SF score or EI (MNA-SF: 60.7% vs. 45.6%, p<0.01, EI: 60.4% vs. 36.8%, p<0.01), respectively. When patients were classified into four groups using cutoff values of MNA-SF score and EI, 1-year readmission rate was significantly higher in patients with low EI than in those with high EI regardless of MNF-SF scores. In multivariate Cox proportional hazard analyses adjusted for known prognostic factors in addition to age and gender, hazard ratios (HR) were significantly higher in patients with high MNA-SF score and low EI (adjusted HR: 2.81, 95% confidential interval [CI]: 1.15 - 9.32, p=0.02) and low MNA-SF score (≤7) and low EI (adjusted HR: 4.16, 95% CI: 1.72 - 13.72, p<0.01) than those with high MNA-SF score and high EI. Kaplan-Meier curves of readmission rates Conclusions Low energy intake is a nutritional status-independent predictor of 1-year readmission rate in elderly HF patients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Heart Journal→Same topicNutrition and Health in Aging→French-language works237,207→