MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2981389625 · doi:10.1093/ofid/ofz360.737

669. Twelve-Month Durability of Microbiota-Based Therapy RBX2660 for Prevention of Recurrent Clostridium difficile Infection

2019· article· en· W2981389625 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Courtney Jones, Sarah Mische, Ken Blount, Bill Shannon

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen Forum Infectious Diseases · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicClostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineClostridium difficileInternal medicineInterim analysisMicrobiomeClinical trialAntibioticsBioinformaticsMicrobiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Recurrent Clostridium difficile infections (rCDI) are a public health threat with insufficient treatment options at present. Two Phase 2 clinical studies have reported the efficacy of RBX2660, a standardized, stabilized microbiota-based drug, in preventing rCDI. For one of these trials, we report herein the durability of clinical response (lack of CDI recurrence) and microbiome restoration to 12 months after RBX2660 treatment. Methods Data were drawn from an interim analysis of a multicenter, open-label Phase 2 study in which participants with multi-recurrent rCDI received up to 2 doses of RBX2660 delivered via enema 7 days apart; this analysis includes data to 12 months after treatment, with follow-up ongoing. Efficacy was defined as the absence of CDI recurrence to 56 days after the last dose; and durability is defined as a continued lack of reported recurrence. Participant stool samples collected prior to and at 1, 7, 30, 60 days and 6 and 12 months after treatment were sequenced using a shallow shotgun method, with only treatment responders reported herein. Operational taxonomic unit (OTU) data were used to calculate relative abundance at the class level and Microbiome Health Indices. Results This study included 149 RBX2660-treated participants and 110 historical control patients, in the United States and Canada. As previously reported, the efficacy of RBX2660 in preventing rCDI (79.9%; 119/149) was higher than CDI-free rates in the historical control group (51.8%, 57/110; P < 0.001). Of 109 participants who had a 6-month follow-up, 97.2% (106/109) remained CDI-free, and no new CDI recurrences were reported at 12 months. Among treatment responders, the microbiome composition was restored after treatment to predominance by Bacteroidia- and Clostridia-class bacteria, and these compositions remained stable to 12 months after treatment among participants who provided samples. Conclusion RBX2660, a microbiota-based drug, was efficacious for preventing rCDI, with clinical and microbiome restoration durability to at least 12 months after treatment. The follow-up of efficacy, safety, and microbiome restoration are ongoing. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.335
Teacher spread0.308 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen Forum Infectious DiseasesSame topicClostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens researchFrench-language works237,207