Relation of outbursts of anger and the acute risk of placental abruption: A case‐crossover study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Roughly, a fourth of all placental abruption cases have an acute aetiologic underpinning, but the causes of acute abruption are poorly understood. Studies indicate that symptoms of stress, depression, and anxiety during pregnancy may be associated with a higher risk of abruption. OBJECTIVE: We examined the rate of abruption in the 2 hours immediately following outbursts of anger. METHODS: In a multicentre case-crossover study, we interviewed 663 women diagnosed with placental abruption admitted to one of the seven Peruvian hospitals between January 2013 and August 2015. We asked women about outbursts of anger before symptom onset and compared this with their usual frequency of anger during the week before abruption. RESULTS: The rate of abruption was 2.83-fold (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.85, 4.33) higher in the 2 hours following an outburst of anger compared with other times. The rate ratio (RR) was lower for women who completed technical school or university (RR 1.38, 95% CI 0.52, 3.69) compared to women with secondary school education or less (RR 3.73, 95% CI 2.32, 5.99, P-homogeneity = .07). There was no evidence that the association between anger episodes and abruption varied by hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (ie preeclampsia/ eclampsia) or antepartum depressive symptoms. CONCLUSION: There was a higher rate of abruption in the 2 hours following outbursts of anger compared with other times, providing potential clues to the aetiologic mechanisms of abruption of acute onset.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".