MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2981413481 · doi:10.4095/291981

Geochemical anomalies in soils and uppermost siliciclastic units overlying the Phoenix uranium deposit, Athabasca Basin, Saskatchewan

2012· report· en· W2981413481 on OpenAlexaffabout
M J Power, Kéiko Hattori, C Sorba, E G Potter

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicRadioactive element chemistry and processing
Canadian institutionsNatural Resources Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologySiliciclasticGeochemistryPhoenixStructural basinUraniumSoil waterUranium oreMining engineeringGeomorphologyArchaeologySoil scienceGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Many mineral deposits are concealed by younger rocks and unconsolidated glacial deposits, which make buried deposits difficult to explore using traditional exploration tools. Under the TGI4 program, this project is examining whether surficial geochemical anomalies exist for deeply buried uranium deposits. This study selected the Phoenix deposit on Denison Mines' Wheeler River Property, located in the southeastern Athabasca Basin, northern Saskatchewan. Discovered in 2008, the deposit currently has a National Instrument 43-101 indicated resource of approximately 40 million lbs U3O8. The uranium oxide minerals are localized within four pods termed the A, B, C and D ore zones. These pods are located mostly along the unconformity between the crystalline basement rocks and overlying Athabasca sandstone units, approximately 400 metres below the surface. The region is characterized by gently rolling hills comprising glacial till and moraines ranging in thickness from 30 to 50 m, with continuous permafrost. A total of 226 soil samples (humus, E-, B-, and C-horizon) were collected from 59 sites along 3 transects at approximately 10 metre intervals over the "A" and "B" ore zones. The extensive transects facilitated sampling of both "mineralized" and "background values" in the study area. Preliminary geochemical analyses of the samples revealed the presence of U, Mo, Co, Ag and W anomalies in humus, B-horizon soil and uppermost sandstone units overlying the ore zones and directly above the basement location of a nearby northeast-trending "WS Hanging Wall" shear zone. Concentrations in the surface media are up to 6 times background values for U, 5 times for Mo, 4 times for Co, 20 times for Ag and 18 times for W. The geochemical anomalies in the surface media and the uppermost sandstone units over the shear zone suggest that the fault has acted as a conduit for upward migration of fluids from the deposit. This preliminary study indicates that geochemical analysis of surface media is potentially an efficient and inexpensive exploration tool for detecting deep-seated uranium deposits.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.221
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRadioactive element chemistry and processingFrench-language works237,207