MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2981427133 · doi:10.1093/cdn/nzz044.p08-083-19

Effects of White Potato Preparation on Subjective Appetite, Food Intake and Glycemic Response in Healthy Older Adults (P08-083-19)

2019· article· en· W2981427133 on OpenAlexaff
Jennifer Lee, Robena Amalraj, Neil R. Brett, Sarah Proteau, Alexander Schwartz, Julia O. Totosy de Zepetnek, Dérick Rousseau, Nick Bellissimo

Bibliographic record

VenueCurrent Developments in Nutrition · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNutritional Studies and Diet
Canadian institutionsUniversity of ReginaToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAppetiteMealMedicineGlycemicGlycemic indexGlycemic loadObesityFood intakeDiabetes mellitusArea under the curveFood scienceInternal medicineEndocrinologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Although some epidemiological studies have linked potato consumption to obesity, diabetes, and mortality, there are limited studies on the effects of potatoes on appetite, food intake, and glycemic regulation in older adults. Therefore, the objective was to compare the effects of white potato preparation on subjective appetite, short-term food intake, and glycemic response in healthy older adults (>65 y). Using a within-subject, repeated-measures design, 20 participants (age: 70.5 ± 0.7 y; BMI: 24.2 ± 0.6 kg/m2) completed five treatment conditions. Following an overnight fast, participants completed five treatment conditions (∼283 kcal) of baked potatoes, mashed potatoes, fried French fries, white bread, or continued to fast. Treatment meals were matched for available carbohydrates (33.1 g) and total fat (13.7 g). Subjective appetite and glycemic response were measured at baseline and over 120 min post-meal consumption using visual analogue scales and capillary blood samples, respectively. An ad libitum pizza lunch was provided to measure food intake at 120 min. Change from baseline subjective appetite and subjective appetite incremental area under the curve (iAUC) were lower after all treatment meals compared with meal skipping (P < 0.01). Ad libitum pizza lunch food intake was lower after all treatment meals compared with meal skipping by 175–215 kcal (P < 0.02). However, cumulative food intake (treatment meal + ad libitum food intake) did not differ among test conditions (P = 0.26). Change from baseline blood glucose and blood glucose iAUC were higher after all treatment meals compared with meal skipping (P < 0.001), but did not differ from each other. White potatoes suppressed subjective appetite and short-term food intake compared with meal skipping, suggesting that white potatoes do not bypass regulatory control mechanisms of energy intake in healthy older adults. Alliance for Potato Research & Education.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCurrent Developments in NutritionSame topicNutritional Studies and DietFrench-language works237,207