MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2981456577 · doi:10.4095/224312

A lithogeochemical assessment of the Lower Cretaceous sediments of the Scotian Basin

2007· report· en· W2981456577 on OpenAlexaff
Georgia Pe‐Piper, Stavros Triantafyllidis, David J. W. Piper, Benjamin J.A. Moulton, R F Hubley

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicPaleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
Canadian institutionsNatural Resources Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCretaceousGeologyStructural basinPaleontology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Whole rock geochemical analyses have been made from conventional core samples of Lower Cretaceous sandstones and shales from the wells: Naskapi N-30, Alma K-85, Alma F-67, Glenelg N-49, Glenelg E-58, North Triumph B-52, Peskowesk A-99 and Dauntless D-35; and from picked cuttings samples from the wells: Sambro I-29, Dauntless D-35, Fox I-22, Crow F-52, and Argo F-38. Samples with abnormal abundances of P, Mg, Ca and Fe result from important amounts of carbonate or phosphate cernent; after removing these samples, 79 reliable analyses were obtained. Published geochemical discrimination diagrams for clastic sediments were evaluated. These diagrams aim to identify effects of source-area weathering, hydraulic sorting during transport, and the character of the source area rocks ( and hence by inference, their tectonic setting). The chemical effects of source area weathering are difficult to interpret because they may be mirrored by the effects ofburial diagenesis. However, there is petrographic evidence for rapid erosion and transport from the source area. Source area rocks were identified as predominantly of intermediate to felsic composition, characteristic of a continental island arc or passive margin. This is consistent with the petrographically identified source areas predominantly within the Appalachian orogen. Sorne discrimination diagrams suggest that the sources to the western Scotian basin were more mafic and those to the east more felsic, consistent with petrographic evidence for important K-feldspar supply to the east and predominant plagioclase supply to the west. Chemical discrimination diagrams did not provide unambiguous characterization of the predominant source rocks for different parts of the basin. Nevertheless, there are significant changes in elemental abundances in different parts of the basin that are interpreted to represent supply from different source rocks. In the east, Peskowesk (and generally also Fox and Dauntless) sandstones are lower in Ti and have a high K/Rb ratio. Sandstones from the Glenelg and North Triumph fields have distinctively high Hf and Th/U ratios and low La/Sm ratios compared with wells both to the east and west. Mudrocks show an increase from west to east in Nb and Y and a decrease in Sr and Hf. There are systematic variations in Th content ofmudrocks between the western (Naskapi and Alma), central (Glenelg and North Triumph) and eastern (Fox, Peskowesk and Dauntless) areas. Data are insufficient in most wells except Alma and Peskowesk to document stratigraphie variation in key elements. Systematic variation in the chemical composition of sediment in the Scotian Basin is consistent with published petrographic evidence for supply from several different rivers. Regional variation in some elements such as Ti and K may have important consequences for diagenesis. More samples will be needed to evaluate hypotheses proposed in this report.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.458
Threshold uncertainty score0.912

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPaleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils→French-language works237,207→