MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2981476115 · doi:10.82308/33665

Relating self-regulation with ecosystem structure and function in Northern Peatlands

2016· article· en· W2981476115 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Avni Malhotra

Bibliographic record

VenueeScholarship@McGill (McGill) · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicPeatlands and Wetlands Ecology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPeatEcosystemEnvironmental scienceCarbon cycleEcologySoil carbonCarbon fibersLand coverAgroforestryGeographyLand usePhysical geographySoil waterSoil scienceBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Peatlands cover 3% of the world's land area and store approximately 30% of the world's soil carbon, thus playing an important role in regional and global carbon cycling. Northern peatlands are particularly vulnerable to climate change, which has motivated research on the response of peatlands to allogenic forcing. However, less attention has been given to the self-regulating potential of peatlands. In this thesis, I describe peatlands under the conceptual framework of complex adaptive systems, wherein cross-scale feedbacks can potentially dampen or accelerate peatland response to disturbances. I hypothesized that the strength of feedbacks, and therefore the self-regulating potential of peatlands, decreases with increasing allogenic forcing. To test this hypothesis, I studied the feedbacks between ecosystem structure and function at different thaw stages in the Stordalen peatland in northern Sweden; a peatland in the discontinuous permafrost zone, where active thaw is occurring. I also collected data at the more stable and autogenic Mer Bleue peatland in eastern Canada. My results support that there are strong feedback mechanisms between structural variables (vegetation, water table and microtopography) at Mer Bleue (Chapter 3). I investigated carbon function (litter decomposition and CO2 and CH4 flux) and its link to structure at Stordalen (Chapters 4 & 5) and found that litter decomposition has weak feedbacks with structural variables along the permafrost thaw gradient (Chapter 4). To further disentangle the structure-function feedbacks, I studied 10 thaw stages and found that the dominant structural controls on CO2 and CH4 fluxes vary with progressing thaw (Chapter 5). A comparison of structural feedbacks at Mer Bleue with those at Stordalen confirmed that feedbacks are weaker in the latter more allogenically controlled site (Chapter 6).This research contributes to the bodies of literature on ecosystem self-regulation and structure-function variability in the discontinuous permafrost zone. The key contributions are as follows: 1) Deductive tests of self-regulation in peatlands are rare and my results support the hypothesis that ecosystem feedbacks are stronger in a stable peatland than in a peatland in transition. 2) My findings highlight the role of transitional stages of thaw on the carbon function of permafrost peatlands. Both contributions emphasize the importance of including self-regulating feedbacks and transitional thaw dynamics to better constrain carbon loss from thawing permafrost peatlands in a rapidly changing global carbon cycle.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.983
Threshold uncertainty score0.035

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.176
Teacher spread0.170 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueeScholarship@McGill (McGill)→Same topicPeatlands and Wetlands Ecology→French-language works237,207→