P1881High-sensitivity cardiac troponin T in patients with acute atrial fibrillation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background Atrial Fibrillation (AF) is the most common sustained cardiac arrhythmia encountered in clinical practice and confers a significant burden to morbidity and mortality. High-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT) levels have provided a significant contribution in the early diagnosis of cardiovascular events; however, the significance of hs-cTnT elevation in the setting of acute AF is not clearly understood. Purpose The aim of this study was to evaluate the factors associated with hs-cTnT elevation and its prognostic implication in patients with acute AF. Methods This single-center prospective study included 406 consecutive patients who presented to the emergency department (ED) with acute AF. Acute AF was defined as a rapid, irregular, and chaotic atrial activity of <48 hours' duration including both the first symptomatic onset of chronic or persistent AF, and episodes of paroxysmal AF. The association between hs-cTnT and outcomes were evaluated using multivariate analyses. Results The mean age of the population was 67.3±12.2 and 74% were male. The median time from the onset of symptoms to ED consultation was 230 minutes (interquartile range: 123–450 minutes). The median hs-cTnT value was 12 ng/L, with 39% of patients with values above the 99 thpercentile. AF was reverted to sinus rhythm in 76% of the patients (83% attempted cardioversion). At one-year, AF recurrence was observed in 38% of the patients and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) (death, myocardial infarction, acute coronary syndrome or stroke) were observed in 6% of the patients. After adjusting for demographic and clinical characteristics in multivariate analysis, hs-cTnT elevation was associated with increasing age and left atrial area (p=0.001). Hs-cTnT levels were not associated with 1-year AF recurrence (p=0.132) or with AF reversion (p=0.869). Hs-cTnT levels were significantly higher in patients who experienced MACE at 1-year (12 ng/L vs 24 ng/L, p=0.001) and hs-cTnT was a predictor of MACE on multivariate analysis (OR 3.486, 95% CI 1.256–5.379, p=0.009). Variable Result AF rate 110 (90–118) Atrial area, cm2 22 (19–27) Cardioversion attemped 82.5% Conclusions Hs-cTnT elevation accounted for a large proportion of patients with acute AF. Elevated levels of hs-cTnT were not associated with AF reversion or with 1-year AF recurrence, however hs-cTnT was highly predictive of MACE at 1-year.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".