MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2981527629 · doi:10.1093/cdn/nzz044.p08-116-19

Omega-3 and omega-6 Fatty Acid Biomarkers and Sleep Duration: Pooled Analysis from Five Prospective Studies in the Fatty Acids and Outcome Research Consortium (FORCE) (P08-116-19)

2019· article· en· W2981527629 on OpenAlexaff
Rachel A. Murphy, Mercedes R. Carnethon, William S. Harris, Vanessa D. de Mello, Matti Uusitupa, Jaako Tuomilehto, Henri Tuomilehto, Eva Lindberg, Dariush Mozaffarian, Qianqian Gu

Bibliographic record

VenueCurrent Developments in Nutrition · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNursing
TopicFatty Acid Research and Health
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInternal medicineMedicineOdds ratioProspective cohort studyFatty acidCohortEndocrinologyBiologyBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Both too little and too much sleep may be detrimental for health, and emerging evidence suggests links between diet and sleep duration. n-3 and n-6 fatty acids (FAs) have physiologic roles in sleep processes including initiation, regulation, and melatonin production. We aimed to assess the association of circulating n-3 and n-6 FA biomarkers with sleep duration in the Fatty Acids and Outcome Research Consortium (FORCE). A pooled cross-sectional analysis of harmonized individual-level analyses from 5 prospective cohorts was performed. FA biomarkers assessed included 18:3n-3, 20:5n-3, 22:5n-3, 22:6n-3, 18:2n-6, 20:4n-6, and the sum of n-3 FAs in lipid compartments (phospholipids, cholesterol esters, total plasma, and total serum). FAs were measured between 1993–2016 and expressed as % of total FAs. Sleep duration was self-reported and categorized as <7 hrs, 7–8 hrs or >8 hrs. The 5 pooled studies comprised 4,691 participants aged 35 to 96 from Finland, Iceland, Sweden and USA. Associations between FAs and sleep duration per interquintile range (10th-90thpercentile) were assessed with a standardized protocol including definitions for exposures, outcomes and covariates. Cohort level odds ratios (OR) were pooled with inverse-variance weighting. Overall, 1,229, 2,812 and 650 participants had sleep duration <7 hrs, 7–8 hrs (reference category) and >8 hrs, respectively. In pooled multivariable adjusted analyses, higher 22:6n-3 was associated with lower odds of sleeping >8 hrs (OR per interquintile range: 0.71, 95% CI: 0.53–0.94); as was the sum of n-3 FAs (OR per interquintile range: 0.76, 95% CI: 0.58–0.99). Other individual n-3 or n-6 FAs were not significantly associated with sleep duration >8 hrs; and none of the n-3 or n-6 FAs were associated with sleep duration <7 hrs. These novel findings demonstrate relationships between n-3 FAs, especially 22:6n-3, and longer sleep duration. The results highlight the need for future prospective studies and interventions to establish temporality, causality, and potential mechanisms. ILSI North America.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.889

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.094
GPT teacher head0.412
Teacher spread0.319 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCurrent Developments in NutritionSame topicFatty Acid Research and HealthFrench-language works237,207