P1023Upstream therapy with spironolactone in patients with atrial fibrillation may reduce the burden of diffuse myocardial fibrosis and arrhythmia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background The pathophysiology of atrial fibrillation (AF) involves a continuum of structural, hemodynamic, and electrophysical remodeling that coexist in a complex interplay, often involving increased diffuse myocardial fibrosis. Purpose To examine whether low dose spironolactone can reduce the extent of diffuse fibrosis in the left atrium (LA) and left ventricle (LV), evaluated using post-contrast T1 myocardial relaxation time (T1 time) and myocardial strain derived from cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR), in patients with paroxysmal and persistent AF. Methods CMR sub-study population of 100 individuals from INSPIRE-AF, an investigator-initiated, randomized, controlled, double-blind study (NCT02764619). Study participants with paroxysmal (n=49) and persistent (n=51) non-valvular AF and LV ejection fraction ≥45% were randomized to spironolactone 25 mg once daily (SPL-group, n=49) or placebo (PL-group, n=51) in addition to standard treatment. CMR scans were conducted at inclusion and after 12 months of treatment. LA and LV measures, including volumes, ejection fraction, and peak systolic longitudinal strain were assessed using cine CMR feature tracking. T1 times were estimated using a previously validated modified look-locker inversion-recovery sequence. Commercially available software (Circle, Calgary, Canada) was used. All participants were followed for recurrences of AF, and all recurrences were documented with a standard 12-lead electrocardiogram. The associations between changes in mean volume, strain, and T1 times were examined using multivariable linear regression, adjusted for baseline age, sex, and AF type. Results LV post-contrast T1 time increased significantly in the SPL group (mean increase in SPL=1,97 ms [95% CI: 0,169; 3,323] vs. PL=0,21 ms [95% CI: −0,67; 1,11], p=0,027 for difference). However, the mean change of post-contrast LA T1 time did not differ between groups. LV peak longitudinal strain was also significantly improved in the SPL group (mean decrease in SPL: 19,82% [95% CI: −0,85; 40,48] vs. PL: 14,15% [95% CI: −36,21; 7,92], p=0,047). Similarly, LA stroke volume corrected for body surface area increased in the SPL-group (mean SPL: 34,33 ml/m2 [95% CI: −2,17; 42,62] vs. PL: 8,46 ml/m2 [95% CI: −20,13; 5,94], p=0,013). All changes remained significant after adjusting for age, sex and systolic blood pressure. No difference was found in arrhythmia burden between groups (P=0,89). Conclusion Low dose spironolactone may reduce the burden of diffuse myocardial fibrosis in AF. However, there was no reduction in the burden of arrhythmia. Acknowledgement/Funding Region of Southern Denmark, University of Southern Denmark, Danish Heart Association
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".