MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2981595741 · doi:10.1093/ofid/ofz360.776

708. In Vitro Activity of Plazomicin vs. Clinical Isolates of Gram-Negative Bacilli, Including Aminoglycoside Nonsusceptible and Multidrug-Resistant Subsets, Recovered from Patients Across Canada as Part of the CANWARD study, 2011–2018

2019· article· en· W2981595741 on OpenAlexaffabout
Andrew Walkty, Heather J. Adam, Melanie Baxter, Philippe Lagacé‐Wiens, James A. Karlowsky, George G. Zhanel

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen Forum Infectious Diseases · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicUrinary Tract Infections Management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of ManitobaManitoba Health
FundersU.S. Department of Health and Human Services
KeywordsMedicineMicrobiologyAminoglycosideBroth microdilutionUrinary systemClinical microbiologyAntibioticsInternal medicineBiologyMinimum inhibitory concentration

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Plazomicin (PLZ) is a next-generation aminoglycoside currently approved by the US FDA for the treatment of complicated urinary tract infections, including pyelonephritis. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the in vitro activity of PLZ against a large collection of Gram-negative bacilli obtained from patients attending Canadian hospitals. Methods Annually from 2011 to 2018, sentinel hospitals across Canada submitted blood, respiratory, urine, and wound isolates from patients attending ERs, medical and surgical wards, hospital clinics, and ICUs (CANWARD). Susceptibility testing was performed using broth microdilution (and breakpoints) as described by CLSI (FDA breakpoints used for PLZ). Results See table. S, susceptible; NS, nonsusceptible; ESBL, extended-spectrum β-lactamase; MDR, multidrug-resistant (NS to antimicrobials from three or more classes); n.d., not defined. Conclusion PLZ demonstrated excellent in vitro activity vs. E. coli and K. pneumoniae clinical isolates, including aminoglycoside NS, ESBL-positive, and MDR subsets. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.154
Threshold uncertainty score0.905

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.309
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen Forum Infectious DiseasesSame topicUrinary Tract Infections ManagementFrench-language works237,207