708. In Vitro Activity of Plazomicin vs. Clinical Isolates of Gram-Negative Bacilli, Including Aminoglycoside Nonsusceptible and Multidrug-Resistant Subsets, Recovered from Patients Across Canada as Part of the CANWARD study, 2011–2018
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background Plazomicin (PLZ) is a next-generation aminoglycoside currently approved by the US FDA for the treatment of complicated urinary tract infections, including pyelonephritis. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the in vitro activity of PLZ against a large collection of Gram-negative bacilli obtained from patients attending Canadian hospitals. Methods Annually from 2011 to 2018, sentinel hospitals across Canada submitted blood, respiratory, urine, and wound isolates from patients attending ERs, medical and surgical wards, hospital clinics, and ICUs (CANWARD). Susceptibility testing was performed using broth microdilution (and breakpoints) as described by CLSI (FDA breakpoints used for PLZ). Results See table. S, susceptible; NS, nonsusceptible; ESBL, extended-spectrum β-lactamase; MDR, multidrug-resistant (NS to antimicrobials from three or more classes); n.d., not defined. Conclusion PLZ demonstrated excellent in vitro activity vs. E. coli and K. pneumoniae clinical isolates, including aminoglycoside NS, ESBL-positive, and MDR subsets. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".