MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2981638186 · doi:10.4095/298729

The accepted values for the internal Geological Survey of Canada (GSC) 9107 Rock-Eval 6 standard (Upper Cretaceous Second White Speckled Shale, Colorado Group), western Canada

2016· report· en· W2981638186 on OpenAlexaffabout
Omid H. Ardakani, Hamed Sanei, L R Snowdon, P.M. Outridge, M Obermajer, Ray Stewart, Richard Vandenberg, Katie Boyce

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicGeochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Canadian institutionsNatural Resources Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSource rockOil shaleGeologyKerogenMineralogySedimentary rockFeldsparCretaceousOrganic matterPetrophysicsGeochemistryGeomorphologyPaleontologyStructural basinGeotechnical engineeringChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Exploration of conventional/unconventional hydrocarbon resources relies on detailed analysis of source/reservoir rocks. Rock-Eval analysis is one of the major methods in screening and characterizing the organic matter type and quantity, thermal maturity, and hydrocarbon potential of sedimentary rocks (Lafargue et al., 1998). In addition, Rock-Eval analysis is also widely used for characterization of organic matter in recent sediments and soil in wide range of environmental and soil fertility studies (e.g., Sanei et al., 2005; Carrie et al., 2012). Fundamentals of Rock- Eval analysis are provided in detail in Lafargue et al. (1998) and Behar et al. (2001). In order to determine the accuracy and precision of analysis, a formally certified standard reference material is typically analysed concurrently with samples to assure the consistency of measured data. However, no commercially available certified reference materials have been characterized for the parameters measured during Rock-Eval analysis. Instead, the Geological Survey of Canada (GSC) Organic Geochemistry Laboratory uses an internal prepared standard (9107) that was calibrated against a rock standard provided by the instrument manufacturer. That standard was developed by using various gravimetric approaches and external calibration of the Rock-Eval flame ionization (hydrocarbons) and thermal conductivity or infrared (CO and CO2) detectors. The 9107 standard is from the Upper Cretaceous Second White Speckled Shale, Colorado Group in western Canada, which is regarded as a typical marine hydrocarbon source rock. This standard is run in a sample batch of 10 to 15 unknown samples to verify the analytical performance of Rock-Eval instrument and ensure the consistency of generated data throughout series of analyses. This report presents the summary results of more than 2000 runs of the 9107 standard since the deployment of three completely refurbished Rock-Eval 6 instruments at the GSC in 2007documenting the accepted values of selected measured Rock-Eval 6 parameters and measurement precision and margin of error for the 9107 standard.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.704
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0040.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeochemistry and Geologic MappingFrench-language works237,207