MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2981649561 · doi:10.4095/291404

The Proterozoic Dessert Lake Red Bed Basin, target for uranium exploration - an update

2012· report· en· W2981649561 on OpenAlexaffabout
Wouter Bleeker, A N LeCheminant

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicRadioactive element chemistry and processing
Canadian institutionsNatural Resources Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProterozoicGeologyStructural basinUraniumUranium oreGeochemistryPaleontologyEarth science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Dessert Lake red beds comprise a largely concealed sedimentary basin outlier of Proterozoic sandstones to the west of Great Slave Lake (Bleeker and LeCheminant, 2007). These sandstones are intruded by Mackenzie age diabase and thus older than 1270 Ma. They overlie and geophysically mask Archean to Paleoproterozoic basement rocks of the southwesternmost Slave craton and adjacent Great Bear Magmatic Zone. Only one outcrop of these sandstones is known, on the western shore of Great Slave Lake, the rest of the basin outlier being concealed underneath thin but geophysically transparent Paleozoic platform rocks. Although much remains to be learned about this weakly tilted but otherwise undeformed sandstone sequence, it likely represents an erosional remnant of a much more extensive Proterozoic red sandstone cover that may have been present across much of the western Canadian Shield. Closest analogues and possibly direct correlatives are the Athabasca Basin to the southeast and the Hornby Bay Basin to the north. Given these likely correlations, and its proximity to Yellowknife, the shores of Great Slave Lake, and the main highway (NWT Highway 3) between Fort Providence and Rae-Edzo, the basin remnant is of some interest to uranium exploration companies. In recent years, much of the basin was staked and a number of exploratory holes were drilled. Several important questions remained however: 1) What is the age of this red bed sequence? 2) How thick is this basin remnant, and is the basal unconformity within reach of drilling and exploration? 3) How far does this basin remnant extend to the west? 4) And finally, does this basin extend far enough west to have been imaged on the regional seismic reflection line of LITHOPROBE's SNORCLE Transect (e.g., Cook et al., 1999). Having identified the eastern edge of this basin with some confidence, including the one outcrop on Great Slave Lake, our initial hypothesis was that the red bed sequence may correspond with a shallow subhorizontal reflector on the SNORCLE reflection profile. Re-investigation of drill core cuttings from several old oil and gas exploration drill holes in the area now rule out this possibility: cuttings at the bottom of several drill holes in proximity to Highway 3 show Paleozoic platformal rocks directly overlying a variety of granitoid rocks. From this we can conclude two things: 1) The Dessert Lake red bed basin wedges out (faulted?) somewhere to the east of Highway 3. And 2) consequently, the major subhorizontal reflector on the SNORCLE seismic profile (at ~2-3 km depth), between Rae-Edzo and Fort Providence, cannot be the basal unconformity of these red beds. Given that it forms a marked, laterally persistent reflector in apparently transparent granitoid basement, we now interpret this major reflector as a large diabase sill of either Hottah (ca. 780 Ma) or Mackenzie (ca. 1270 Ma) age. If the red beds continue to the west, they likely do so, discontinuously, along a northwesterly trend parallel to the North Arm of Great Slave Lake.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.034
Threshold uncertainty score0.067

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.070
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRadioactive element chemistry and processingFrench-language works237,207