P1952Value of GRACE risk score in risk stratification in acute coronary syndrome patients undergoing PCI in the Global Leaders study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Aims We sought to evaluate the value of GRACE risk score in stratifying acute coronary syndrome patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention in the Global Leaders study. Methods Global Leaders study was a prospective, multi-center, open-label, all-comers, randomized controlled trial comparing ticagrelor monotherapy after 1 month of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) as experimental therapy with aspirin monotherapy after 12 months of conventional DAPT (reference therapy) in patients who received PCI with biolimus-A9 eluting stent. We assessed the predictive value of GRACE risk score in ACS patients undergoing PCI in the present analysis. Patients were stratified according to GRACE risk score into low (1–108), moderate (109–140), High (141–372) risk group. Clinical outcomes at 2 years after PCI were assessed and compared among risk groups. Interaction between GRACE risk score and antiplatelet regimen were analyzed by the interaction term in Cox model. Results GRACE risk score was calculated from 8 clinical parameters at presentation. Among ACS patients, 1664 patients were categorized in low risk group, 2903 patients were in moderate risk group, and 2028 patients were in high risk group. The rate of all-cause mortality, any stroke, patient-oriented composite endpoint (POCE) were highest in the high-risk group at 2 years (All-cause mortality; low risk 1.4%, moderate risk 2.5%, high risk 6.1%, log rank test p value <0.0001, any stroke; low risk 0.7%, moderate risk 1.0%, high risk 2.0%, log rank test p value 0.001, POCE; low risk 12.4%, moderate risk 11.9%, high risk 16.61%, log rank test p value <0.0001). The rate of myocardial infarction, all revascularization and definite or probable stent thrombosis were not different among three groups. There was no interaction between GRACE risk score and treatment regimen on clinical outcomes at 2 years. Conclusion GRACE risk score is valuable in identifying ACS patients with highest risk of all-cause mortality, any stroke and POCE at 2 years after PCI. In ACS, ticagrelor monotherapy did not improve the outcomes at 2 years in the three strata of the GRACE risk score.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".