1722. Histoplasmosis Acquired in Alberta, Canada, 2011–2018
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background Histoplasmosis is a serious fungal infection caused by the geographically restricted, dimorphic fungus Histoplasma capsulatum. In Canada, the geographic range of H. capsulatum is classically thought to be restricted to southern parts of Ontario and Quebec. Over the past decade, histoplasmosis has occasionally been diagnosed in patients in Alberta without travel to areas of known geographic risk (Figure 1). We studied the epidemiology and geographic distribution of histoplasmosis in Alberta to assess evidence for locally-acquired infections. Methods We retrospectively reviewed all laboratory-confirmed (culture, antigen and/or immunodiffusion positive) cases of histoplasmosis diagnosed from January 1, 2011 to June 30, 2018. Data collected by public health and clinical charts were reviewed for clinical presentation, exposure and travel histories, and geographic distribution of cases. Cases of histoplasmosis in patients who had not left Alberta or associated with a local point source were classified as definite local acquisition; cases in patients with remote travel but with local exposures and appropriate timing of disease onset were deemed “probable” cases of local infection. University of Alberta’s Research Ethics Board approved this study. Results We identified 45 laboratory-confirmed cases of histoplasmosis, including 17 cases that were locally acquired. Among these, there were 12 cases of definite local acquisition, including 8 patients from 3 point-source outbreaks—all involving exposure to bats and/or their droppings in chimneys or attics of private dwellings or churches—and 4 sporadic cases in patients who had never traveled. Of the other 5 cases probably acquired in Alberta, patients had previously traveled (n = 4) or travel history was incomplete (n = 1) but local exposures preceding infection were considered compelling. The mean incidence rate of locally acquired infection was 0.062/100,000 population with incidence increasing since 2014. Table 1 shows features of locally acquired cases. Conclusion This study, for the first time, establishes Alberta as a region of geographic risk for histoplasmosis. The diagnosis should be considered in patients with compatible symptoms and exposure history, even in the absence of travel. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".