MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2981724854 · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehz746.1074

P6484Invasive and non-invasive characterisation of low gradient aortic stenosis

2019· article· en· W2981724854 on OpenAlexaff
Hannah McConkey, Michael Marber, Jack Lee, Howard Ellis, Jubin Joseph, Christopher Allen, Haseeb Rahman, Tiffany Patterson, Cian M. Scannell, Philippe Pîbarot, Amedeo Chiribiri, Simon Redwood, Bernard Prendergast

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Heart Journal · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
Canadian institutionsUniversité LavalInstitut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de Québec
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCardiologyInternal medicineStenosisHyperaemiaContractilityEjection fractionAortic pressureAfterloadFractional flow reserveCoronary flow reserveHemodynamicsCoronary artery diseaseMyocardial infarctionHeart failureBlood flowCoronary angiography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Low gradient severe aortic stenosis (LGAS) is associated with unfavourable outcomes when compared to high gradient aortic stenosis (HGAS), yet the contributing pathophysiology is poorly understood. Methods Symptomatic LGAS and HGAS patients undergoing trans-catheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) underwent 3T stress perfusion cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) pre-(within 24 hours) and post-(4–6 months) TAVI. Left ventricular (LV) contractility and coronary flow/pressure were measured during hyperaemia and rapid pacing, immediately before and after TAVI, using a conductance LV catheter and dual-pressure and Doppler sensor–tipped guidewire in the mid-left anterior descending coronary artery. Results 24 patients were recruited resulting in 19 suitable datasets (LGAS N=9, HGAS N=10, equally matched for comorbidities and B-natriuretic peptide level). LGAS patients had a smaller LV end diastolic volume index (p=0.035) and lower LV mass index (LVMI) (p=0.037). Pre-TAVI stress global endocardium-epicardium gradient was 0.88±0.09 and global myocardial perfusion reserve (MPR) 2.0±0.48 in 14 patients (6 LGAS and 8 HGAS patients, no difference between groups). Pre-TAVI, baseline coronary data demonstrated lower augmentation pressure (AP, p=0.035) and augmentation index (AIx, p=0.02) in the LGAS group. LGAS patients also exhibited a shorter ejection time (p=0.015), larger forward compression waves during rest, hyperaemia and rapid pacing, and smaller backward expansion waves (BEW) (p=0.001). Lower baseline end systolic pressure (p=0.004), inotropy (dP/dt+, p=0.045), lusitropy (dP/dt-, p=0.069), and stroke work (p=0.019) were observed in the LGAS group. Whilst LV size was smaller the LGAS group, rapid pacing induced a more significant drop in end systolic volume (p=0.045) and ejection fraction (p=0.015) in patients with HGAS. Post-TAVI, the hyperaemic BEW fell sharply (p<0.001), along with coronary VTI (p=0.02), and average pulse velocity (p=0.028), and AP and AIx remained lower (p=0.034 and p=0.031, respectively). The forward expansion wave was reduced in LGAS during rapid pacing. The HGAS group displayed a more profound drop in dP/dt+ (p=0.011) and dP/dt- p=0.014) at rest following intervention. Repeat CMR demonstrated statistically significant reduction in LV size and LVMI (p=0.012 and p<0.001, respectively) with significant increase in 3D global peak radial, circumferential and longitudinal strain (p=0.004, p=0.001 and p=0.018, respectively). Post-TAVI stress global endocardium-epicardium gradient was 0.88±0.13 and MPR 2.46±0.59 (improved from pre-TAVI, p=0.05). There was no difference in remodelling patterns or perfusion between the two groups. Conclusion This is the first study detailing the combined invasive and CMR pathophysiological changes in LGAS. Despite invasive parameters indicating a disease of less severe AS, the level of perfusion abnormality is disproportionate which may in part, relate to their adverse prognosis. Acknowledgement/Funding This research is funded by a Clinical Research Training Fellowship grant from the British Heart Foundation (FS/16/51/32365).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Heart Journal→Same topicCardiac Imaging and Diagnostics→French-language works237,207→