MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2981735012 · doi:10.4095/297733

Hydro-stratigraphic correlation by portable X-ray fluorescence spectrometry based chemostratigraphy

2016· report· en· W2981735012 on OpenAlexaffabout
R D Knight, B A Kjarsgaard, H A J Russell, D R Sharpe

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicGeochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Canadian institutionsNatural Resources Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemostratigraphyGeologyBoreholeAqua regiaGeochemistryFluorescence spectrometryMineralogyGeophysicsPaleontologyIsotopes of carbonChemistryFluorescenceEnvironmental chemistryTotal organic carbon

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In glacial basins stratigraphic correlation is commonly based on lithostratigraphic methods. Correlation can be significantly improved through the use of geophysical and geochemical properties; however widespread subsurface geophysical data is often limited. For groundwater studies, the collection of sediment geochemistry data is often beyond the scope and budget of many programs and is generally not included as a part of routine data collection. Portable X-ray fluorescent (pXRF) spectrometry has proven to be a successful, cost effective tool to characterize the chemostratigraphy of glacially derived sediments and to improve the interpretation of downhole geophysics, micropaleontology results, and pore water geochemistry. Data collected from this method has now become a routine part of borehole studies within the Groundwater Program at the GSC. Analytical protocols have been developed to utilize portable X-ray fluorescence spectrometry (pXRF) to obtain precise and accurate data for a suit of up to 14 elements detected in the <63 microns grain size fraction (Ba, Ca, Cu, Fe, K, Mn, Ni, Rb, S, Sr, Ti, V, Zn, Zr). This protocol was developed through the analyses of over 10,000 samples obtained from multiple glacial basins across Canada, and verified against traditional laboratory methods (fusion, four acid, aqua regia digestions) using >500 samples. The introduction of chemostratigraphic techniques to samples collected from boreholes establishes chemical and related mineralogical variations within sediments and contributes to information collected by sediment description, grain size data, downhole geophysical and stratigraphic correlations. Geochemical data also provides an opportunity to establish a chemostratigraphic framework that complements other stratigraphic correlation techniques, for example lithostratigraphy and biostratigraphy. Results have demonstrated the ability of chemical analyses obtained from pXRF spectrometry to identify stratigraphic units, refine sedimentological interpretations, and correlate within glacial basins. The addition of geochemical analyses has refined paleogeographic interpretations; provenance studies, and provides information to support 3-D geological models with increased confidence in stratigraphic correlations. A pilot study in the Greater Toronto Area (GTA) of 10 borehole cores, sampled at approximately one metre interval (1057 sample analysis), has provided a proof of concept for planning of a series of chemostratigraphic transects across southern Ontario. Samples will be collected from OGS and GSC archival material for 18-20 boreholes for approximately 2000 samples. Additionally reanalysis of a suite of samples from the NATMAP (< 50 samples) orientation sample transect in the GTA will provide a link with surface geochemical sampling and the subsurface chemostratigraphic data.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.062
Threshold uncertainty score0.123

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeochemistry and Geologic Mapping→French-language works237,207→