GlobeSAR-2 Education and Training Program Update
Bibliographic record
Abstract
GlobeSAR-2 investigators presented results from their applications projects at the final GlobeSAR-2 symposium in Buenos Aires Argentina in May 1999, successfully ending this portion of the GlobeSAR-2 Program. However, the GlobeSAR-2 Program itself is far from over. This paper provides an update and report on the two primary activities supported under the GlobeSAR-2 University Program: the North-South University Linkages and the CD-ROM being produced from the GlobeSAR-2 training materials. The GlobeSAR-2 University Program was designed to help ensure that educators and students at universities throughout the eight participating countries in South America could benefit from the efforts devoted to the development of the unique and comprehensive radar training program. Its objectives are to foster their involvement in research projects, and to encourage use of the GlobeSAR training materials beyond the life of the program. The training materials produced for the GlobeSAR-2 training workshops were collected, refined, and enhanced with sections that had been suggested. A CD-ROM has been produced entitled: GlobeSAR-2 - Educational Resources for Radar Remote Sensing. Illustrations are from Latin American and Canadian R&D projects. The product is multilingual - Spanish, Portuguese, French and English. A preview will be given at the symposium. The GlobeSAR-2 North-South University Linkages component is creating opportunities for educators and researchers from participating countries to establish and develop joint research and educational linkages with their counterparts in Canadian universities. More than 20 exchange projects have been established involving13 universities in 7 Latin American countries and faculty from 12 Canadian Universities. The paper presents an overview of the program and status of research results to date. A Web discussion group has been established to encourage the exchange of information, experience and expertise among GlobeSAR-2 participants. The components of GlobeSAR-2 University Program were developed to help ensure that there will be a lasting impact and sustainable capacity in the use of SAR imagery, through curriculum resources and linkages among GlobeSAR-2 partners.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.205 | 0.100 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".