MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2981776638 · doi:10.1177/2513826x19879454

Reconstruction of Combined Full-Thickness Defect of the Lateral Canthus and Lateral Upper and Lower Third Eyelids With an Extended Modification of the Fricke Flap, Periosteal Flap, and Conjunctival Flap

2019· article· en· W2981776638 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenuePlastic Surgery Case Studies · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicReconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCanthusEyelidAnatomyMedicineBasal cellSurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: The Fricke flap was originally described in 1829 as a laterally based flap from the temporal region that could be used to reconstruct potentially total lower eyelid defects. There have been a few minor modifications of this flap to allow for adjustments of the donor site scar, but none that address the sequelae of brow elevation and allow for reconstruction of a composite defect of the lateral canthus, lateral upper, and lower eyelids. We report our modification of the Fricke flap that allows for total reconstruction of these structures. Clinical Report: A 61-year-old male presented with composite defect of the lateral eyelids and canthus following resection of a basal cell carcinoma by Mohs technique. A Fricke flap was designed and modified to included elements of the above brow and below brow skin as an additional pennant flap. A “Y” shaped periosteal flap and inferior fornix conjunctival flap were also used to reconstruct the posterior lamella. Our surgical technique and follow-up are demonstrated. Discussion: Lateral eyelid and canthal reconstruction can be difficult to reconstruct with a single rotational flap from local sources. We describe our technique of modifying the Fricke flap to include an additional pennant of below brow skin that can be used to reconstruct the lateral eyelids and canthus allowing for a crisp lateral eyelid crease and acceptable donor site and aesthetic appearance. Conclusions: This is the first description of a modification of the Fricke flap that allows for total lateral eyelid and canthus reconstruction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.592

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it