In situ stress orientations and magnitudes in the Liard Basin of Western Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Part 1 of this report presents the conclusions reached from identifying and recording the orientations of borehole breakouts recorded on 4-arm dipmeter logs from 47 wells in the Liard Basin of western Canada. Two borehole imagery logs were also examined and they provided orientation data for breakouts and drilling-induced fractures. Twenty-seven of the forty-seven wells exhibited 2 breakout populations. In the majority of wells, the major breakout populations exhibited mean azimuths that cluster between NW-SE and NNW-SSE. These orientations are interpreted to reflect the direction of SHmin, the smaller horizontal principal stress. A few wells exhibited significant breakout populations that were at high angles to this regional trend. It is suspected that, in these cases, nearby fault zones may have deflected the stress trajectories. A table of results has been prepared and all the supporting data are recorded in the Appendix. Figures showing breakout population axes, stress trajectories, and areas where fault zones may be deflecting stresses are included in the text. All the data presented in the report are available in digital format. Part 2 of this report describes gathering and processing subsurface pressure data from the records of wells drilled in the Liard Basin in northwestern Canada. Part 2 of the Liard Basin Study is concerned with establishing principal stress magnitudes at as many locations as possible across the basin and mapping how these parameters vary laterally at strategic horizons. Information from laboratory tests and field observations in numerous oil and gas fields worldwide indicate that oil and gas reservoir permeability is inversely related to rock stress. The less a rock body is compressed, the greater will be its permeability, all other factors being equal. That is the operational justification for this investigation, but it is also anticipated that the findings will contribute to an improved understanding of the tectonic evolution of that part of the Canadian landmass occupied by the Liard Basin. All the data analyzed here are in the public domain and come from well logs, drilling histories and well history reports. These sources of information provided data that was used to estimate the magnitudes of the vertical stress (SV) and the smaller horizontal stress (SHmin). The interpretation of vertical stress variation across the Liard Basin employed density logs from 64 wells. Analysis of these logs allowed a lateral variation in vertical stress magnitude (SV) to be mapped at various depths. The smaller horizontal stress (SHmin) was mapped using leak-off test pressure and fracture breakdown pressures. The larger horizontal stress (SHmax) was determined via numerical simulation of breakout failure, as well as being calculated algebraically. Horizontal and vertical effective stresses were calculated and mapped and their relationship to seismic activity was speculated upon.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".