MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2981878262 · doi:10.4095/219787

RADARSAT-1 SAR for Hurricane Watch

2001· report· en· W2981878262 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
P.W. Vachon, Peter G. Black, Peter Dodge, K. B. Katsaros, P. Clemente‐Colón, William G. Pichel, K. MacDonell

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSynthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) Applications and Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRemote sensingMeteorologyEnvironmental scienceClimatologyComputer scienceGeographyGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

RADARSAT-1's ScanSAR wide (SCW) modes, with swath widths of 450 or 500 km and a spatial resolution of 100 m, can provide both near-synoptic scale and small-scale views of the imprint of mesoscale meteorological processes and features on the ocean surface's roughness. In the case of hurricanes, the images show wind speed and direction effects around the relatively calm eye, as well as regions of intense convection, rainfall, organized boundary layer phenomena such as boundary layer rolls, and storm-generated swell. Although initial observations were largely serendipitous, Hurricane Watchhas routinely acquired SCW imagery of hurricanes during the 1999 and 2000 Atlantic Basin hurricane seasons (nominally August through October). The Canadian Space Agency's Disaster Watch Program and Background Mission Program submitted SCW imagery requests in support of this project. Disaster Watch made manual requests as late as 29 hours in advance of the pass time that were fewer in number but more accurate than those of the Background Mission. In this paper, we discuss some of the scheduling and swath coverage constraints, and show and discuss some of the striking images that were acquired. New insights to storm morphology, storm dynamics, and SAR ocean imaging have followed from these observations. Hurricane Watch will be repeated in 2001, with a particular emphasis on the study of organized boundary layer structures between rain bands. The wide spread extent of these structures was first revealed by RADARSAT-1 images.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.031
Threshold uncertainty score0.103

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0310.016

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSynthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) Applications and TechniquesFrench-language works237,207