MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2981911786 · doi:10.4095/223775

Paskapoo groundwater study part V: detailed outcrop measured sections of the Scollard, Porcupine Hills and Paskapoo formations in the Calgary region, Alberta

2007· report· en· W2981911786 on OpenAlexaffabout
A P Hamblin

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicGroundwater flow and contamination studies
Canadian institutionsNatural Resources Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPorcupineOutcropGeologyGroundwaterArchaeologyGeomorphologyGeographyPaleontologyGeotechnical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Paskapoo Formation, of Paleocene age, is an important, but poorly understood groundwater aquifer in western Alberta, and is now becoming recognized as a shallow-gas reservoir. Because the Paleocene rocks represent the bedrock at surface over their area of occurrence, and have not previously been a major hydrocarbon target, there has been little study of outcrop or subsurface data. This report briefly summarizes outcrop fieldwork, primarily detailed measured sections, in the Bow River corridor, in an east-west transect, both within and west of the city of Calgary, where Porcupine Hills-Paskapoo rocks are intermittently exposed. The material is presented as 15 standard measured sections, with text descriptions of units, and measured paleocurrent data, which approximate a continuous succession of the strata represented in this region. Two main facies are present: a) thick, multistoried fluvial channel sandstones with erosive bases, and b) pedogenically altered siltstones with thin sandstone interbeds and calcrete horizons. This report complements two other Open Files on outcrop sections of the Paskapoo Formation: one on the Red Deer River (GSC OF 5535), and the other on drillcore sections of Paskapoo rocks in central Alberta (GSC OF 5537).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.058
Threshold uncertainty score0.117

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGroundwater flow and contamination studies→French-language works237,207→