First-principles investigation of the structural, elastic, electronic, and optical properties of semiconducting AgBr<sub>1–</sub><sub><i>x</i></sub>I<sub><i>x</i></sub> (0 ≤ <i>x</i> ≤ 1) ternary alloys in rock-salt and zinc blende structures
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this work, first principle calculations of the structural, electronic, elastic, and optical properties of novel AgBr1–xIx ternary alloys in rock-salt (B1) and zinc-blende (B3) structures are presented. The calculations were performed using the full-potential linear muffin-tin orbital (FP-LMTO) method within the framework of the density functional theory (DFT). The exchange and correlation potentials were treated according to the local density approximation (LDA). The lattice constants for the B1 and B3 phases versus iodide concentration (x) were found to deviate slightly from the linear relationship of Vegard’s law. The calculated electronic properties showed that AgBr1–xIx alloys in the B3 structure have a direct band gap (Γ – Γ) for all concentrations of x, which means that they can be used in long-wavelength optoelectronic applications, while in the B1 structure they have an indirect (Γ – R) band gap. The elastic constants Cij, shear modulus G, Young’s modulus E, Poisson’s ratio ν, index of ductility B/G, sound velocities vt, vl, and vm, and Debye temperature θD were also reported and analyzed. By incorporating the basic optical properties, we discussed the dielectric function, refractive index, optical reflectivity, absorption coefficient, and optical conductivity in terms of incident photon energy up to 13.5 eV. The present results were found to be in good agreement with the available experimental and other theoretical results.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".