A GIS dataset of geological features for the Etanda Lakes map area (95 C/16), Northwest Territories and Yukon Territory
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The geological map and database are derived from regional mapping in the Etanda Lakes (NTS 95C/16) 1:50 000 scale map area, as part of the Geological Survey of Canada's Central Foreland NATMAP project. Geological features represented by attributed points, lines, and polygons have been compiled into a GIS dataset suitable for stand-alone use, or integration with other data sets. User-defined attributes provide traditional geological map information with greater detail and enhancements such as explicit orientation data, location and description of curated samples, and lithologies at visited outcrops. The Etanda Lakes map area is situated at the southern end of the Franklin Mountains encompassing the Liard Range and the convergence of the Kotaneelee, La Biche, and Tlogotsho Ranges. The geology of the area is characterised by sedimentary strata, of Late Devonian to Early Cretaceous age, exposed in a series of asymmetrical box or kink folds whose geometry is controlled largely by the competence of the Carboniferous Mattson Formation. Structure in the area is dominated by the culmination of the Etanda Dome where several anticline trends converge. In the eastern part of the map area the Liard Range exposes a series of closely spaced box folds locally imbricated by thrust faults of minor displacement. The trend of structures in the Liard Range varies from NNW to NNE, following the curve of the range. Lower Cretaceous strata of the Kotaneelee syncline occupy the valley shared by Chinkeh Creek and Jackfish River. Stratigraphic features include the westward shale-out of the Flett and Prophet Formations into the Besa River Formation and the sub-Cretaceous unconformity, which cuts out Permian strata to the north and east. The distinctive Chinkeh Formation at the base of the Cretaceous succession was mapped on both sides of the Kotaneelee Syncline.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.011 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.041 | 0.020 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".