Bibliographic record
Abstract
The surficial geology of the Thinahtea Lake (NTS 94 P/9) map area is dominated by the effects of continental glaciation during the Late Wisconsinan (ca. 25 000-10 000 years ago). In general the ice sheet advanced from the northeast, but the ice thinned during deglaciation and divided into distinct lobes. The map area became dominated by one lobe flowing southward from the Mackenzie River valley in the north, and a second lobe in the south, occupying the Shekilie River. Glacial flutings in the northern part of the map area record the southern flow of the northern lobe. Thinahtea Lake itself occupies a large meltwater channel that was probably the mouth of a large subglacial tunnel emanating from the northern ice lobe. Numerous eskers lie along the northern edge of the lake. Initially the northern and southern lobes were in contact along an area of hummocky moraine, just south of the Petitot River, but once they separated meltwater collected between the lobes along the lowland occupied by the modern Petitot River with drainage to the west. The western part of the Petitot River valley, however, was initially occupied by the northern ice lobe and the main drainage was forced southward along the northern margin of the Etsho Plateau. The Petitot River did not occupy its present course until the northern ice lobe retreated northward. Much of the map area is underlain by thick clayey till and glaciolacustrine deposits, which are poorly drained and covered by extensive muskeg. Areas of thick peat are likely underlain by permafrost and probably contain significant amounts of ground ice.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.109 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".