MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2982046993 · doi:10.4095/296684

Regional characterization of ultramafic to mafic intrusions in the La Grande Rivière and Eastmain domains, Superior Province, Quebec

2015· report· en· W2982046993 on OpenAlexaffabout
M G Houlé, J Goutier, A -A Sappin, V J McNicoll

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological Modeling and Analysis
Canadian institutionsNatural Resources Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaficUltramafic rockGeologyGeochemistryIntrusionGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Eeyou Istchee Baie-James region is dominantly underlain by Archean rocks belonging to the Superior Province, which is mainly composed of juxtaposed sequences of predominantly sedimentary, volcano-plutonic and plutonic rocks. The distribution of mafic to ultramafic intrusions and ultramafic volcanism reveals a general abundance at the regional scale, with the greatest volume in the La Grande Riviere and Eastmain domains of the La Grande Subprovince in the central-eastern part of the Superior Province flanked by the Opinaca Subprovince to the south, the Ashuanipi Subprovince to the east, and the Minto Subprovince to the north. Preliminary geochronological results in the Eeyou Istchee Baie-James region indicate that the ultramafic-mafic magmatism extended over a period of more than 200 Ma, from ca. 2.88 Ga to 2.63 Ga. Various types of ultramafic to mafic magmatism have been documented in the La Grande Riviere and Eastmain domains and their vicinity: 1) ultramafic lavas and ultramafic intrusions of komatiitic affinity; 2) dominantly ultramafic intrusions; 3) dominantly mafic intrusions; 4) ultramafic to mafic intrusions of alkaline affinity; and 5) lesser volumes of ultramafic lamprophyres. Several of these ultramafic to mafic intrusion types also contain Cr-(PGE), Ni-Cu-(PGE), and Fe-Ti-(V) mineralization. The most important examples of these types of mineralization include the Menarik Complex (Cr?(PGE)), the Lac des Montagnes intrusions Cr-(PGE), the Lac Gayot intrusions (Ni-Cu-(PGE)), the Nisk intrusion (Ni-Cu-(PGE)), and the baie Chapus Pyroxenite (Fe-Ti-(V)). As part of the Targeted Geoscience Initiative Phase 4 (TGI-4), the Geological Survey of Canada and the Ministere de lmp;gt;'Energie et des Ressources naturelles (MERN) have undertaken reconnaissance work to better characterize these types of intrusions in terms of their distribution, geochemical and mineralogical characteristics, and prospectivity for the above-mentioned mineralization types. Studies are ongoing for intrusions in the Lac Yasinski, Lac Pelletan, Lac Gayot, Lac des Montagnes, and Lac Fed areas, in addition to a more regional study underway in the area south of the La Grande 4 Reservoir (Lac Richardie). New geochronological work is also in progress, which will allow us to better understand the temporal distribution of the ultramafic to mafic magmatism in this portion of the Superior Province. A better understanding of these ultramafic and mafic intrusions will also reveal whether they demonstrate similar characteristics to ultramafic to mafic intrusions recently discovered in the McFaulds Lake area of Ontario (a.k.a. "Ring of Fire"), which contains major Cr-(PGE) and Ni-Cu-(PGE) deposits.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.182
Threshold uncertainty score0.960

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeological Modeling and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207