MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2982061528 · doi:10.1093/ofid/ofz360.2405

2728. Proportion of Invasive Pneumococcal Disease Potentially Covered by Current and Next-Generation of Higher-Valency Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccines in Canada, 2010–2016

2019· article· en· W2982061528 on OpenAlexaffabout
Stéphane Dion, Jelena Vojicic, Maria Major, Rajeev M. Nepal, Bradford D. Gessner, Alejandro Cané, Jose A Suaya

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen Forum Infectious Diseases · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPneumonia and Respiratory Infections
Canadian institutionsPfizer (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePneumococcal conjugate vaccinePneumococcal diseasePediatricsAge groupsSerotypeYoung adultStreptococcus pneumoniaeDemographyInternal medicineImmunologyAntibiotics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background In Canada, routine pediatric immunization with 7-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV7) was introduced between 2002 and 2006. Two of ten provinces transitioned to PCV10 in 2009; by mid-2011, following a national preferential recommendation, PCV13 replaced PCV7/PCV10 across Canada. PCV13 also has been recommended for immunocompromised adults since 2013, and immunocompetent adults aged ≥65 years on an individual basis since 2016. Immunization with 23-valent polysaccharide vaccine (PPV23) is recommended in adults with certain comorbidities, and routinely in those aged ≥65 years. Two higher-valency PCVs, PCV15, and PCV20 are currently under development. Methods Case counts of invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD) by serotype and age group were obtained from published annual reports of passive laboratory-based national IPD surveillance conducted by the National Microbiology Laboratory (NML) since April 2010. Results In all ages, the proportion of IPD due to PCV13 serotypes declined from 55% in 2010 to 31% in 2016 (Figure 1); in children age < 5 years, from 66% to 19%; in adults age 50–64 years, from 52% to 34%, and in adults age > 65 years from 51% to 25%. While most age groups have experienced declines in the proportion of PCV13-type IPD, this proportion has plateaued since 2014 in all age groups except 2–4 years old. During 2016, among all ages, the proportions of IPD due to PCV13, PCV15, and PCV20 types were 31%, 43%, and 58%, respectively; among children age < 5 years 19%, 35%, and 50%, respectively, among adults 50–64 years, 34%, 47%, and 61%, respectively, and among adults age ≥65 years, 25%, 38%, and 53%, respectively. Conclusion The proportion of PCV13-type IPD has declined across all ages since the introduction of PCV13 in children. The plateau in this proportion observed across most age groups since 2014 suggests that herd effect may have been maximized, and additional reductions could be expected primarily from direct PCV13 adult immunization. PCV20 could potentially protect against a large proportion of the remaining IPD burden in Canada. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.185
Threshold uncertainty score0.948

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen Forum Infectious DiseasesSame topicPneumonia and Respiratory InfectionsFrench-language works237,207