MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2982082721 · doi:10.1093/cdn/nzz044.p08-039-19

Impact of Dairy Food Intake on Glucose Homeostasis: A Randomized Controlled Trial (P08-039-19)

2019· article· en· W2982082721 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Kelsey A. Schmidt, Gail Cromer, Maggie S. Burhans, Jessica N. Kuzma, Derek Hagman, Imashi Fernando, Kristina M. Utzschneider, Sarah Holte, Mario Kratz

Bibliographic record

VenueCurrent Developments in Nutrition · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNutritional Studies and Diet
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInsulin resistanceMedicineGlucose homeostasisType 2 diabetesDairy foodsGlucose tolerance testSkimmed milkInsulinDiabetes mellitusAnimal scienceInternal medicineEndocrinologyFood scienceBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The consumption of dairy foods, both low-fat and full-fat, tends to be associated with better metabolic health and lower type 2 diabetes risk in most observational studies. We aimed to test the effects of diets rich in either low-fat or full-fat dairy products on glucose tolerance and its key determinants, compared to a diet limited in dairy. We hypothesized that diets rich in dairy, particularly full-fat dairy, would improve glucose homeostasis. Seventy-two men and women with the metabolic syndrome first completed a 4-week wash-in period during which they limited their dairy intake to no more than 3 servings of skim milk per week. Participants were then randomized to either continue the limited dairy diet or switch to a diet containing 3.3 servings per day of either low-fat or full-fat milk, yogurt, and cheese, for 12 weeks. Glucose tolerance and its key determinants (insulin sensitivity, beta-cell function, liver fat content, low-grade inflammation) were assessed before and after the 12-week intervention period. In primary per protocol analyses (n = 67), repeated measures analysis of variance revealed no treatment effect on glucose tolerance, as measured by the area-under-the-curve glucose in a 3-hour oral glucose tolerance test (P = 0.340). However, intervention effects were seen for the homeostasis model assessment insulin resistance index (P = 0.004 overall), and post hoc tests showed a significant increase in insulin resistance in the low-fat dairy group (mean ± SD + 0.8 ± 1.4, adjusted P = 0.03) and the full-fat dairy group (+ 1.3 ± 1.7, adjusted P = 0.003) compared to the limited dairy group (-0.2 ± 1.1). These effects were unchanged in secondary analyses adjusted for moderate changes in fat mass. In this 12-week dietary intervention study, we detected no evidence for our hypothesis that dairy consumption improves glucose tolerance. Unexpectedly, insulin resistance increased in individuals consuming diets rich in either low-fat or full-fat dairy products, compared to participants who limited their dairy intake. This work was supported by the National Dairy Council, Dairy Farmers of Canada, the Dutch Dairy Association (NZO), Dairy Australia, and the French Dairy Interbranch Organization (CNIEL).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.875

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.330
Teacher spread0.300 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCurrent Developments in NutritionSame topicNutritional Studies and DietFrench-language works237,207