MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2982185239 · doi:10.1093/ofid/ofz360.2095

2417. Feasibility and Safety of Using a Probiotic Comprised of Lactobacillus acidophilus CL1285, L. casei LBC80R and L. rhamnosus CLR2 for C. difficile Infection Prevention Among Antibiotic Users: 15-Years of Prospective Results from a Single-Center

2019· article· en· W2982185239 on OpenAlexaffabout
Pierre-Jean Maziade, Daniel J. Lussier, Francoise Dubé

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen Forum Infectious Diseases · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicClostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research
Canadian institutionsCentre intégré de santé et de services sociaux de Chaudière-Appalaches
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineProbioticAntibioticsLactobacillus rhamnosusLactobacillus caseiLactobacillus acidophilusInternal medicinePediatricsEmergency medicineMicrobiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Hospitals use multiple concurrent prevention strategies to curb nosocomial C. difficile infection, but there are limited data on the long-term feasibility or safety of using a probiotic. Pierre-Le Gardeur Hospital, Québec, has been administering a probiotic comprised of Lactobacillus acidophilus CL1285, L. casei LBC80R and L. rhamnosus CLR2 since 2004 with documented results through March 31, 2014. Here we present an update for the past 5 years. Methods Several nosocomial infection prevention practices were running concurrently at the hospital. Adult inpatients treated with antibiotics from April 1, 2014 to March 31, 2019 were eligible to receive the probiotic. The hospital pharmacy ensured that each patient took the probiotic capsules (Bio-K+® 50 Billion) daily from the initiation of antibiotic use. Confirmed nosocomial cases of C. difficile infection were recorded and reported to the provincial public health agency. The rate of nosocomial CDI for this hospital was compared with other non-University affiliated hospitals in the health region with more than 110 beds and fewer than 45% of patients age 65 and older, and, to all other hospitals in the health system. Results Cumulatively over the past 15 years, more than sixty thousand antibiotic-treated adult inpatients took the probiotic daily during antibiotic use. Among 13 comparable hospitals, Pierre-Le Gardeur Hospital had the lowest rate of nosocomial CDI in 2014–2015, 2015–2016, 2016–2017, 2017–2018 and on average had the lowest rate for 2013–2018 (1.1 CDI cases per 10,000 patient-days). Compared with all hospitals in the Province of Quebec health system, N = 95, the hospital had the lowest nosocomial CDI rate on average for 2013–2018. No cases of Lactobacillus bacteremia were detected. Conclusion The overall infection prevention strategy has been highly effective, resulting in a consistently low rate of nosocomial CDI. We found that it is feasible to administer this probiotic to antibiotic-treated inpatients with few restrictions. No Lactobacillus infections were observed from any of the three strains of bacteria for this probiotic when given to more than sixty thousand adult inpatients. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen Forum Infectious DiseasesSame topicClostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens researchFrench-language works237,207