MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Focus on the Inclusive Sustainable Growth of Mongolia - the Main Condition of Prosperity the Country in the System of the World Economic Relations

2018· article· en· W2982210425 on OpenAlex
Улаан Чултэм

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueBulletin of Baikal State University · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicRussia and Soviet political economy
Canadian institutionsLibrary of Parliament
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProsperitySustainable developmentChinaEconomic growthGlobalizationInclusive growthNatural resourceSustainable growth ratePopulationDevelopment economicsEconomic systemBusinessPolitical scienceEconomicsPovertySociologyMarket economy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The article examines development trends of the world economy that is faced with a number of chronic and new problems impeding stable economic growth and sustainable inclusive development. This requires the implementation of a number of measures aimed at solving these problems on a supranational, global level. It is also necessary to encourage trade and investments and to support fair globalization geared towards sustainable comprehensive development. The author notes that Mongolia is well-paced to move into a group of highly developed countries, since it has rich natural resources, a young population, a developed infrastructure in the sphere of education and healthcare and, moreover, is located between two great countries - Russia and China (which form a new world center for economic development - BRICS). All of the above-mentioned can ensure the realization of its competitive advantages.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.868
Threshold uncertainty score0.968

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it