MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2982222837 · doi:10.14393/sn-v31-2019-46344

Caracterização geotécnica e geoambiental da bacia do Córrego São Pedro- Uberlândia/MG: contribuição para elaboração do plano de drenagem urbana

2019· article· pt· W2982222837 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueSociedade & natureza · 2019
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicGeography and Environmental Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsHumanitiesGeomorphologyGeologyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article presents the results of a research aimed at geotechnically and geoenvironmentally characterizing the São Pedro stream basin, located in Uberlândia/MG - Brazil, from the physical environment’s attributes and properties, with a view to using land as a means of rainfall infiltration. The used methodology focuses on analytical mapping and generating cartographic documents that are individually elaborated and analyzed. Besides that, the characterization of unconsolidated materials (in situ and in laboratory) and coefficient of permeability (k) tests (in situ with a Guelph permeameter) were performed. With this data at hands, a quali-quantitative analysis of the physical environment’s features was made through the study of its attributes and their representation in maps. Variables related to infiltration and runoff processes were privileged. For the area of the São Pedro stream basin, values of k varying between 10-4 and 10-5 cm/s were found. The adequacy-to-infiltration map showed the areas next to the streams and in the stream’s mouth as non-adequate or slightly-adequate. On the other hand, the areas close to the drainage divides of the basin showed to be highly-adequate. The center of the basin and the region between the Jataí and the Lagoinha streams are also highly-adequate to infiltration. These areas with higher adequacy are appropriate to the implementation of structural and non-structural measures that seek to reduce flood risks. Thus, we hope to contribute to urban planning in this study area through these geoenvironmental maps.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.059
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it