MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Artificial light at night (ALAN), blue light spectrum exposure and colorectal cancer risk in Spain (MCC-Spain study)

2019· article· en· W2982240560 on OpenAlexaff
Ariadna García-Saenz, Sánchez de Miguel A, Arroba Espinosa, Anyela Andrea Medina Valentin, Laura Costas, Gemma Castaño‐Vinyals, Víctor Moreno, Marina Pollán, Martin Aubé, Manolis Kogevinas

Bibliographic record

VenueEnvironmental Epidemiology · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicImpact of Light on Environment and Health
Canadian institutionsCégep de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineOdds ratioConfidence intervalLight pollutionColorectal cancerProstate cancerDemographyConfoundingBreast cancerCancerInternal medicineOpticsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

TPS 782: Health effects of emf, radiation and light, Johan Friso Foyer, Floor 1, August 28, 2019, 3:00 PM - 4:30 PM Background/Aim. Night shift work, exposure to artificial light-at-night (ALAN) and the consequent circadian disruption may increase the risk of breast and prostate cancer. Recent studies have also identified increased risk of colorectal cancer among night shift workers. We have previously shown that exposure to blue light spectrum was associated with an increased risk for breast and prostate cancer. We evaluated the association of exposure to ALAN during sleeping time, focusing on blue light spectrum, with colorectal cancer among subjects who had never worked at night in a general population case-control study in Spain (MCC-Spain). Methods. We examined information on 528 incident histologically confirmed colorectal cancer cases and 960 controls from Barcelona and Madrid, 2007-2013. Outdoor-ALAN, based on images from the International Space Station (Earth Science and Remote Sensing Unit, NASA Johnson Space Centre https://eol.jsc.nasa.gov) including data on remotely sensed upward light intensity and blue light spectrum, was assigned to participants’ geocoded longest residence (average >30 yrs). We calculated the melatonin suppression index (MSI) for each pixel of the image that estimates the percentage of outdoor blue light spectrum exposure. We derived odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) from logistic regression models adjusting for potential confounders. Results. Exposure to blue light spectrum was positively associated with colorectal cancer (OR=1.89; 95%CI: 1.4-2.6; highest vs. lowest tertile) adjusting for area, age, sex and education. ORs were similar when further adjusting for area socioeconomic status, sleep, smoking, diet and cancer family history. ORs were slightly higher for colon as compared to rectal cancer and were similar when including ever night-shift workers. Outdoor visual light (full spectrum) was inversely associated with colorectal cancer (OR = 0.58, 95%CI: 0.4-0.8). Conclusions. Outdoor blue enriched light spectrum, an increasingly prevalent exposure in recent years, may be associated with colorectal cancer risk in the general population.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.060
Threshold uncertainty score0.119

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnvironmental EpidemiologySame topicImpact of Light on Environment and HealthFrench-language works237,207