MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2982257776 · doi:10.1016/j.prrv.2019.10.002

Cerebral oxygenation in children with sleep-disordered breathing

2019· review· en· W2982257776 on OpenAlexaff
Laurence Tabone, Sonia Khirani, Alessandro Amaddeo, Guillaume Émériaud, Brigitte Fauroux

Bibliographic record

VenuePaediatric Respiratory Reviews · 2019
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicObstructive Sleep Apnea Research
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNeurocognitiveMedicineOxygenationPathophysiologyBreathingSleep (system call)CardiologyAnesthesiaInternal medicineCognitionPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) is associated with neurocognitive and behavioral dysfunction, and structural brain abnormalities. Near infrared spectroscopy allows a continuous and non-invasive monitoring of brain tissue oxygenation, giving insight in some pathophysiological mechanisms potentially associated with SDB-related neurocognitive dysfunction. The present review summarizes the finding of studies describing brain tissue oxygenation in adults and children with SDB. Contrary to adults, mean nocturnal tissue oxygenation index (TOI) during sleep does not seem to be different in children with SDB as compared to healthy controls. During respiratory events such as apnoeas and hypopnoeas, the decrease in TOI precedes the peripheral, systemic desaturation. The decrease in TOI has been shown to be greater during apnoeas as compared to hypopnoeas, during rapid-eye movement sleep as compared to other sleep stages, in younger children as compared to their older counterparts, and in those with a high apnoea-hypopnoea index as compared with a low apnoea-hypopnoea index. Studies analyzing the association between repetitive changes in TOI and neurocognitive and behavioral dysfunction may help to decipher the pathophysiology of neurocognitive dysfunction associated with SDB in children.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.985
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0050.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.076
GPT teacher head0.355
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePaediatric Respiratory ReviewsSame topicObstructive Sleep Apnea ResearchFrench-language works237,207