Performance investigation of ground source heat exchanger with desiccant-based hybrid cooling system in humid climate
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract A desiccant-based hybrid cooling is among the most cost-effective air conditioning systems. The main purpose of this paper is the assessment of the potential of ground-assisted direct evaporative cooler together with a desiccant evaporative cooling cycle integrated with a ground source renewable energy for the pre-cooler process. Simulation results obtained using the TRNSYS software are compared with experimental data. The simulation of the mentioned systems are conducted in Bari (south of Italy), Palermo (south of Italy) and Ramsar (north of Iran) for the humid-mild climate of July. Assuming the low regeneration temperature (T reg ) for the desiccant wheel is one of the highlights of this paper. Utilizing ground source heat exchanger (GSHE) will result in increase of the system potential in providing thermal comfort. The average thermal comfort achieves in Bari, Palermo and Ramsar in 95.72%, 93.94% and 93.15% of the time from 6 AM to 6 PM in July with utilizing the combination of GSHE and desiccant cooling system. The COP of this cycle is highly dependent on the T reg , and varies in the range of 0.35-0.53, 0.34-0.6 and 0.34-0.52 for the maximum T reg of 50 °C in Bari, Palermo and Ramsar, respectively.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it