MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2982307475 · doi:10.1111/jnc.14590

Towards a better understanding of <scp>AQP</scp>4′s role in astrocytic process extension

2018· letter· en· W2982307475 on OpenAlexafffund
Daniel Kai Long Tham, Hakima Moukhles

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Neurochemistry · 2018
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicBarrier Structure and Function Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsExtension (predicate logic)Process (computing)Cell biologyChemistryNeuroscienceComputer scienceBiologyProgramming language

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

At the blood-brain-barrier (BBB), blood vessels are surrounded by the endfoot structures formed by astroglial cells. The latter are themselves part of a larger syncytial network of astrocytes connected to each other via a complex web of processes. The water-permeable channel aquaporin-4 (AQP4) is expressed at high concentrations at these endfeet, held in place by the dystrophin glycoprotein complex (DGC), a collection of proteins that act as a bridge linking AQP4 to the laminin-containing basal lamina found in between the blood vessels and the astrocytic endfeet. Although AQP4, supported by the DGC, has well-established roles in facilitating certain neurological processes, and in mediating the removal of excess water from the brain in certain disease states, relatively few studies have looked at the importance of these components in the regulation of the extension of the processes that are so characteristic of astrocytes. In this Editorial Highlight, we discuss an article by Sato et al., published in this issue of the Journal of Neurochemistry, which attempts to address this question.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.272
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of NeurochemistrySame topicBarrier Structure and Function StudiesFrench-language works237,207