Electric-magnetic duality in the quantum double models of topological orders with gapped boundaries
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract We generalize the electric-magnetic (EM) duality in the quantum double (QD) models to the extended QD models of topological orders with gapped boundaries. We also map the extended QD models to the extended Levin-Wen (LW) models with gapped boundaries. To this end, we Fourier-transform and rewrite the extended QD model on a trivalent lattice with a boundary, where the bulk gauge group is a finite group G. Gapped boundary conditions of the model before the transformation are known to be characterized by the subgroups K ⊆ G supplying the boundary degrees of freedom. We find that after the transformation, the boundary conditions are then characterized by the Frobenius algebras AG,K in RepG. An AG,K is the dual space of the quotient of the group algebra of G over that of K , and RepG is the category of the representations of G. The EM duality on the boundary is revealed by mapping the K ’s to AG,K ’s. We also show that our transformed extended QD model can be mapped to an extended LW model on the same lattice via enlarging the Hilbert space of the latter. Moreover, our transformed extended QD model elucidates the phenomenon of anyon splitting in anyon condensation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".