MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2982390050 · doi:10.5539/jmr.v11n6p14

Some Series and Mathematic Constants Arising in Radioactive Decay

2019· article· en· W2982390050 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Xun Yu Zhou

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Mathematics Research · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicStatistical Mechanics and Entropy
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsSeries (stratigraphy)MathematicsHalf-lifeIsotopeRadiogenic nuclideConvergent seriesRadioactive decayConstant (computer programming)Pure mathematicsMathematical analysisPhysicsNuclear physicsPower series

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper we show the construction of 32 infinite series based on the law of decay of radioactive isotopes, which indicates that a radioactive parent isotope is reduced by 1/2 and 1/e of its initial value during each half-life and mean life, respectively. We found that the ratios among the values of the radioactive parent isotope and the radiogenic daughter isotope for each half-life’s and mean life’s decay can be used to construct 16 half-life related (or 2-related) and 16 mean life related (or e-related) infinite series. There are 8 divergent series, 4 previously known convergent series and 2 series converging to the Erdös-Borwein constant. The remaining 18 series are found to converge to 18 mathematical constants and the divergent and alternating mean life related series leads to another 2 mathematical constants. A few interesting mathematical relations exist among these convergent series and 5 sequences are also attained from the convergent half-life related series.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.308

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.367
Teacher spread0.320 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Mathematics ResearchSame topicStatistical Mechanics and EntropyFrench-language works237,207