MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2982410758 · doi:10.1109/wcnc.2019.8885517

Energy-Efficient Resource Allocation for UAV-Enabled Wireless Powered Communications

2019· article· en· W2982410758 on OpenAlexaff
Saif Najmeddin, Ali Bayat, Sonia Aı̈ssa, Sofiène Tahar

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicUAV Applications and Optimization
Canadian institutionsInstitut National de la Recherche ScientifiqueUniversité du Québec à MontréalConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceEfficient energy useWirelessResource allocationPath lossTelecommunications linkTransmission (telecommunications)Resource management (computing)Energy (signal processing)Power (physics)Computer networkReal-time computingEngineeringElectrical engineeringTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper investigates the energy efficiency optimization in a wireless communication network where devices are wirelessly powered via unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) to enable uplink data transmission. First, the path loss of the air-to-ground channels is minimized by optimizing the position of the UAV depending on the ground nodes' service demands. Then, using the optimized positioning and a closed-form expression for the energy efficiency, a resource allocation aiming at maximizing the energy efficiency is developed. To this end, two algorithms are proposed, using Lagrangian optimization and gradient decent methods. Numerical results and comparisons are provided. In particular, the results show an enhancement in energy efficiency and reduced wireless power charging time when the ground nodes' demands are taken into consideration.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicUAV Applications and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207