MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2982451792 · doi:10.1016/j.envint.2019.105216

Characterization of chromium species and distribution during Cr(VI) removal by biochar using confocal micro-X-ray fluorescence redox mapping and X-ray absorption spectroscopy

2019· article· en· W2982451792 on OpenAlex
Peng Liu, Carol J. Ptacek, David W. Blowes, Y. Zou Finfrock, Yingying Liu

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueEnvironment International · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicChromium effects and bioremediation
Canadian institutionsCanadian Light Source (Canada)University of Waterloo
FundersState Administration of Foreign Experts AffairsNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsChromiumBiocharFluorescenceRedoxX-rayChemistryConfocalAbsorption (acoustics)Characterization (materials science)Analytical Chemistry (journal)Materials scienceEnvironmental chemistryOpticsInorganic chemistryNanotechnologyPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

• Cr(VI) decreased from 50 to <0.02 mg/L by biochar at pH 2 with 8.8% in solution as Cr(III). • Bulk XANES show only Cr(III) in solid phase, whereas micro-XANES show 0–36% Cr(VI). • EXAFS indicate removed Cr in Cr(OH) 3 form with same atomic structure of goethite. • Confocal µ-XRF redox mapping show only Cr(III) in biochar at early reaction time. • Reaction steps include electrostatic attraction, diffusion, reduction, ion exchange. Biochar is an effective, environmentally sustainable material for removing Cr(VI) from water. Potential removal mechanisms include surface reactions or reactions within the biochar structure with direct bonding of Cr(VI) or reduction of Cr(VI) and bonding of the reduced Cr forms. Diffusion process and Cr(VI) and Cr(III) distributions in biochar particles have not been elucidated. Aqueous Cr(VI) removal experiments followed by solid-phase analyses were conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of raw and modified oak wood biochar for removing aqueous Cr(VI) and to further determine removal mechanisms. Results showed that concentrations of Cr(VI) decreased from ~50 to <0.02 mg L −1 at initial pH 2 after 1 d using raw oak wood biochar, with 8.8% of the initial aqueous Cr reduced to Cr(III) in the solution. Similarly, effective removal of Cr(VI) was observed using polysulfide-modified biochar; whereas ~54% of initial Cr(VI) was removed using HNO 3 -treated biochar. Bulk X-ray absorption near-edge structure (XANES) analysis showed Cr is present as Cr(III) within the unmodified biochar, whereas confocal micro-XANES analysis showed the existence of Cr(VI) (0–36%) in selected spots and Cr(0) (43%) in one spot within a biochar sample collected after 30 min. Extended X-ray absorption fine structure (EXAFS) results showed the atomic structure of Cr within the unmodified biochar was similar to Cr(OH) 3 , with O and Cr in the first and second shells. Confocal micro-X-ray fluorescence imaging (CMXRFI) results indicated total Cr (tCr) was heterogeneously distributed in the imaged area with a higher intensity close to the particle surface. Redox mapping results indicated no Cr(VI) in the unmodified biochar collected at 30 min; Cr(III) was the primary form and also remained close to the surface at later time. The removal mechanisms likely involve electrostatic attraction and diffusion inside the particle, followed by reduction and ion exchange reactions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.495
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.187
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it