MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2982592234 · doi:10.1101/826925

A Compendium of Kinetic Cell Death Modulatory Profiles Identifies Ferroptosis Regulators

2019· preprint· en· W2982592234 on OpenAlexafffund
Megan Conlon, Carson D. Poltorack, Giovanni C. Forcina, Alex Wells, Melodie Mallais, Alexis Kahanu, Leslie Magtanong, Derek A. Pratt, Scott J. Dixon

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2019
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicFerroptosis and cancer prognosis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Institutes of HealthDamon Runyon Cancer Research Foundation
KeywordsProgrammed cell deathSmall moleculePI3K/AKT/mTOR pathwayApoptosisCell biologyCancer cellBiologyCellChemistryCancer researchBiochemistryCancerGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Cell death can be executed by regulated apoptotic and non-apoptotic pathways, including the iron-dependent process of ferroptosis. Small molecules are essential tools for studying the regulation of cell death. Using live-cell, time-lapse imaging, and a library of 1,833 small molecules including FDA-approved drugs and investigational agents, we assemble a large compendium of kinetic cell death ‘modulatory profiles’ for inducers of apoptosis and ferroptosis. From this dataset we identified dozens of small molecule inhibitors of ferroptosis, including numerous investigational and FDA-approved drugs with unexpected off-target antioxidant or iron chelating activities. ATP-competitive mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors, by contrast, were on-target ferroptosis inhibitors. Further investigation revealed both mTOR-dependent and mTOR-independent mechanisms linking amino acid levels to the regulation of ferroptosis sensitivity in cancer cells. These results highlight widespread bioactive compound pleiotropy and link amino acid sensing to the regulation of ferroptosis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)Same topicFerroptosis and cancer prognosisFrench-language works237,207