MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2982744915 · doi:10.1093/eurpub/ckz185.246

Risk of macrosomia and low birthweight among immigrants in Belgium, a perfect mirror?

2019· article· en· W2982744915 on OpenAlexaff
Judith Racapé, Mouctar Sow, Claudia Schoenborn, M. De Spiegelaere

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Journal of Public Health · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCancer Risks and Factors
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNaturalizationSocioeconomic statusDemographyImmigrationTurkishFetal macrosomiaMedicineLogistic regressionLow birth weightOdds ratioOddsPregnancyGeographyPopulationSociologyGestationInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Both low birthweight (LBW) and macrosomia are associated with increased risk health conditions but risk factors of macrosomia among immigrant are understudied. One hypothesis is that some migrant groups at high risk for LBW have correspondingly low risk for macrosomia, and vice-versa. Our objective was to analyze LBW and macrosomia among immigrants according to naturalization, time since naturalization and socioeconomic status in Belgium. Methods The data came from the linkage between the Brussels birth and death registers, the national register of migrant trajectories and the social security register for the years 2004-2010. We used logistic regression to estimate the odds ratios of the associations between LBW and macrosomia according to maternal nationality and time since naturalization, taking into account socioeconomic status (SES), parity and maternal age. Results Data relate to all singleton births among Belgian, Maghrebi, Sub-Saharan African and Turkish women (n = 76 312). Compared to Belgians, we observed lower risk of LBW but higher risk of macrosomia among Maghrebi women (p < 0.0001). Among Turkish and Sub-Saharan African mothers the risk of LBW is higher than the Belgian (p < 0.001) but the risk of macrosomia is similar to Belgian mother. The results show a U-shaped increase of LBW and decrease of macrosomia with time since naturalization for all migrant groups. Results did not change after adjustment with maternal characteristics and SES. In parallel, we observe an improvement of SES among all migrant groups. Conclusions Our results show an increase of LBW rates and a decrease of macrosomia among Maghrebi, Sub-Saharan African and Turkish women with time since naturalization. The risk of macrosomia completely mirrors the risk of LBW for Maghrebi mother but not for Sub-Saharan African and Turkish women. Further studies would help to better explain risk factor and social determinants of macrosomia among immigrant. Key messages We observed an increase of LBW but a decrease of macrosomia with time since naturalization among immigrants. Patterns of macrosomia do not completely mirror those of LBW among different migrant groups.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.047
Threshold uncertainty score0.392

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Journal of Public HealthSame topicCancer Risks and FactorsFrench-language works237,207