MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2982756419 · doi:10.1063/1.5121306

Nonequilibrium path-ensemble averages for symmetric protocols

2019· article· en· W2982756419 on OpenAlexafffund

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Chemical Physics · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaAlberta Innovates - Technology Futures
KeywordsEstimatorNon-equilibrium thermodynamicsWork (physics)Process (computing)Protocol (science)Energy (signal processing)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

According to the nonequilibrium work relations, path-ensembles generated by irreversible processes in which a system is driven out of equilibrium according to a predetermined protocol may be used to compute equilibrium free energy differences and expectation values. Estimation has previously been improved by considering data collected from the reverse process, which starts in equilibrium in the final thermodynamic state of the forward process and is driven according to the time-reversed protocol. Here, we develop a theoretically rigorous statistical estimator for nonequilibrium path-ensemble averages specialized for symmetric protocols, in which forward and reverse processes are identical. The estimator is tested with a number of model systems: a symmetric 1D potential, an asymmetric 1D potential, the unfolding of deca-alanine, separating a host-guest system, and translocating a potassium ion through a gramicidin A ion channel. When reconstructing free energies using data from symmetric protocols, the new estimator outperforms existing rigorous unidirectional and bidirectional estimators, converging more quickly and resulting in a smaller error. However, in most cases, using the bidirectional estimator with data from a forward and reverse pair of asymmetric protocols outperforms the corresponding symmetric protocol and estimator with the same amount of simulation time. Hence, the new estimator is only recommended when the bidirectional estimator is not feasible or is expected to perform poorly. The symmetric estimator shows similar performance to a unidirectional protocol of half the length and twice the number of trajectories.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.778
Threshold uncertainty score0.338

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Chemical PhysicsSame topicAdvanced Thermodynamics and Statistical MechanicsFrench-language works237,207