MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2982862832 · doi:10.1016/j.brs.2019.11.006

A case series of a novel 1 Hz right-sided dorsolateral prefrontal cortex rTMS protocol in major depression

2019· letter· en· W2982862832 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Jean‐Philippe Miron, Helena Voetterl, Farrokh Mansouri, Daniel M. Blumberger, Zafiris J. Daskalakis, Jonathan Downar

Bibliographic record

VenueBrain stimulation · 2019
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicTranscranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
Canadian institutionsCentre for Addiction and Mental HealthToronto Rehabilitation InstituteUniversity of TorontoCentre Hospitalier de l’Université de MontréalUniversity Health Network
FundersCampbell Family Mental Health Research InstituteArrell Family FoundationH. Lundbeck A/SOntario Mental Health FoundationFondation Brain CanadaW. Garfield Weston FoundationCentre for Addiction and Mental HealthCampbell InstituteBranch Out Neurological FoundationNational Alliance for Research on Schizophrenia and DepressionCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchCentre for Addiction and Mental Health FoundationNational Institutes of HealthFamily Care FoundationNational Institute of Mental HealthOntario Brain InstituteWilliam E. and Josephine B. Buchanan Family FoundationKlarman Family FoundationBrain and Behavior Research Foundation
KeywordsTranscranial magnetic stimulationTolerabilityDorsolateral prefrontal cortexDepression (economics)AnxietyMoodTreatment-resistant depressionPsychologyPsychiatryMajor depressive disorderMedicinePrefrontal cortexPsychotherapistPhysical medicine and rehabilitationNeuroscienceStimulationInternal medicineCognitionAdverse effect

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Although effective in treatment-resistant depression (TRD) and superior in tolerability to medication, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is currently burdened by high costs of equipment acquisition, operation and technical complexity, precluding its widespread use [1]. Simplifying the treatment technique could facilitate more widespread uptake of rTMS in community settings. To this end, we investigated a non-cooled parabolic coil that is less expensive than cooled figure of eight (Fo8) coils and allow simplified positioning because of its central opening and wide stimulation area.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0040.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2019
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBrain stimulationSame topicTranscranial Magnetic Stimulation StudiesFrench-language works237,207