MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2982996777 · doi:10.1182/blood-2019-123757

An Individualized Risk Mitigation Approach for Safety: Experience from the Mosunetuzumab (CD20/CD3 Bispecific Antibody) Development Program in Relation to Neurotoxicity Risk

2019· article· en· W2982996777 on OpenAlexaff
Catherine Diefenbach, Sarit Assouline, Francesc Bosch, Chan Y. Cheah, Won Seog Kim, Matthew J. Matasar, Carlos Panizo, Dok Hyun Yoon, Brendan C. Bender, Genevive Hernandez, Chi‐Chung Li, Bruce McCall, Carol O’Hear, Michael C. Wei, Shen Yin, Kasra Yousefi, Antonia Kwan, Loretta J. Nastoupil

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBiomedical Ethics and Regulation
Canadian institutionsRoche (Canada)Jewish General Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAdverse effectCytokine release syndromeInternal medicineClinical trialRituximabCD20OncologyAntibodyImmunologyChimeric antigen receptorImmunotherapyCancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Neurologic toxicities have resulted in restrictions in driving/engaging in hazardous occupations and activities for pts receiving marketed T-cell-engaging CD19-directed bispecific antibodies and chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapies. Mosunetuzumab (M; RG7828) is a full-length, fully humanized immunoglobulin G1 (IgG1) bispecific antibody targeting both CD3 (on the surface of T cells) and CD20 (on the surface of B cells). Clinical trials investigating the safety and preliminary efficacy of M currently mandate a driving restriction for enrolled pts while receiving treatment. Data collected to date show that neurologic toxicities associated with M may be milder than for other CD19-directed therapies, which may be due in part to the step-up dosing regimens investigated (Budde et al. ASH 2018; Bartlett et al. ASCO 2019). We initiated a systematic review of neurologic adverse events (NAEs) in pts treated with M to characterize the nature of driving-impacting NAEs and to develop a more patient-centric approach to NAE risk-mitigation that would reduce the burden on pts in M clinical trials. Methods: A systematic review of NAEs observed in the ongoing Phase I/Ib study (GO29781; NCT02500407) of M in relapsed or refractory non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) pts (n=205) was performed (data cutoff: Jan 31, 2019; median safety follow-up: 116 days). NAEs were defined as any AE reported as a Preferred Term (PT) within the System Organ Class (SOC) Nervous System Disorders and SOC Psychiatric Disorders, as recommended by FDA. NAEs were further classified by those that have impact on cognition and consciousness (CC-NAEs), and those that may impair driving (DI-CC-NAEs). In conjunction with an independent neurology consultant, DI-CC-NAEs were adjudicated based on medical judgement and determined a priori based on reported PTs. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression with a 5% significance level was performed to determine the association of demographic and disease characteristics with DI-CC-NAEs occurring in the first 3 cycles of M treatment, as 90% (27/30) of events occurred within this period. Results: NAEs were observed in 49% (100/205) of enrolled pts and were mostly grade (Gr) 1-2 (Gr 1, 69/205 [34%]; Gr 2, 24/205 [12%]). The most frequent NAEs were headache (32/205, 16%), dizziness (27/205, 13%), and insomnia (19/205, 9%). Gr ≥3 NAEs were rare (3%, all Gr 3) and occurred as clinical sequelae to non-NAEs (e.g. Gr 3 hepatic encephalopathy secondary to Gr 4 liver function test increased, Gr 3 seizure secondary to electrolyte disturbance, Gr 3 post-herpetic neuralgia). The majority of NAEs occurred early and were transient (median onset from first M infusion: 16 days; median duration: 10 days). Most resolved (11% were unresolved at time of data cut). Frequency of NAEs was not associated with M dose level (Figure) or exposure (Li et al. ASH 2019). At the time of data cut, 30 DI-CC-NAEs (Gr 1, 17/30 [57%]; Gr 2, 9/30 [30%]; Gr 3, 4/30 [13%]) were reported, including PTs of confusional state, delirium, disturbance in attention, encephalopathy, hallucination, memory impairment, and seizure. These events were observed in 24 (12%) pts, and were mostly Gr 1-2 (26/30, 87%). Three pts experienced four Gr 3 DI-CC-NAEs (confusional state, hepatic encephalopathy, encephalopathy, seizure). The majority of DI-CC-NAEs (67%) occurred in pts with aggressive NHL (aNHL) and who had elevated C-reactive protein (CRP) at baseline based on the local institutional upper limit of normal (sensitivity: 67%; specificity: 66%; positive predictive value: 23%; negative predictive value: 93%; Table). Other characteristics included in the multivariate analysis were age, sex, and tumor bulk, but these did not demonstrate association with occurrence of DI-CC-NAEs. Conclusion: Based on these analyses, the driving restriction that applied to all pts for the duration of M treatment was amended to a restriction covering the first 2 cycles only in a subset of pts who had aNHL and elevated CRP at baseline. This novel approach of individualized risk mitigation for driving based on in-depth assessment of NAEs allows for a more targeted and patient-centric mitigation strategy to optimize the protection of pts at risk, and is useful during clinical development when the safety profile is being characterized. As further data are accumulated, the multivariate analysis can be updated to further refine the pts at risk for DI-CC-NAE. Disclosures Diefenbach: Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Denovo: Research Funding; Genentech: Consultancy, Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; LAM Therapeutics: Research Funding; MEI: Research Funding; Merck: Consultancy, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Millenium/Takeda: Research Funding; Trillium: Research Funding. Assouline:Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Bosch:Kyte: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Acerta: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Honoraria, Research Funding; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd/Genentech, Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; AstraZeneca: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Cheah:F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Honoraria, Research Funding; AbbVie: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Gilead: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Acerta: Honoraria; Loxo: Honoraria. Kim:J + J: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Celltrion: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Donga: Research Funding; Kyowa-Kirin: Research Funding; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Research Funding. Matasar:Merck: Consultancy, Equity Ownership; Genentech, Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel, accommodation, expenses , Research Funding; Bayer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel, accommodation, expenses , Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline: Honoraria, Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel, accomodation, expenses, Research Funding; Rocket Medical: Consultancy, Research Funding; Teva: Consultancy; Bayer: Other: Travel, accommodation, expenses; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Juno Therapeutics: Consultancy. Panizo:Janssen: Speakers Bureau; Kyowa Kirin: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Yoon:F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Research Funding. Bender:Genentech, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Hernandez:Genentech, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Li:F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Employment, Equity Ownership. McCall:F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Equity Ownership; Genentech, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. O'Hear:Genentech, Inc.: Employment; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Equity Ownership. Wei:Genentech, Inc./F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Employment, Equity Ownership. Yin:Genentech, Inc: Employment, Equity Ownership. Yousefi:F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Employment. Kwan:Genentech, Inc: Employment, Equity Ownership. Nastoupil:Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Bayer: Honoraria; Spectrum: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Genentech, Inc.: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria; TG Therapeutics: Honoraria, Research Funding; Gilead: Honoraria. OffLabel Disclosure: Mosunetuzumab (RG7828) is a full-length, fully humanized immunoglobulin G1 (IgG1) bispecific antibody targeting both CD3 (on the surface of T cells) and CD20 (on the surface of B cells). Mosunetuzumab redirects T cells to engage and eliminate malignant B cells. Mosunetuzumab is an investigational agent.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.232
Threshold uncertainty score0.441

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.313
Teacher spread0.291 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBloodSame topicBiomedical Ethics and RegulationFrench-language works237,207