Thermodynamic temperature of the triple point of xenon measured by refractive index gas thermometry
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Measurements of the refractive indices of helium and argon using a quasi-spherical microwave resonator and upgraded experimental protocol are reported at the temperatures of the triple points of water and xenon. The results at the triple point of water are used to determine the compressibility of the resonating cavity, which is bounded by the copper shell of the resonator. This experimentally-determined compressibility is consistent with the literature value for copper, but with much smaller measurement uncertainty. The measured compressibility is extrapolated to the triple point of xenon, and combined with the refractive index results at that temperature to determine the thermodynamic accuracy of the International Temperature Scale of 1990 (ITS-90): (T - T ₉₀) = (-6.9 ± 1.7) mK at ITS-90 temperature T ₉₀ = 161.40596 K, corresponding to a xenon triple point thermodynamic temperature of T = (161.3991 ± 0.0017) K. The experimental compressibility is further extrapolated to the triple points of argon, oxygen and neon, and used to re-analyze earlier refractive index gas thermometry measurements made using the same resonator, yielding updated values with reduced uncertainties: (T - T ₉₀) = (-4.1 ± 1.6) mK at T₉ ₀ = 83.8058 K, (T - T₉₀) = (-2.0 ± 0.8) mK at T ₉₀ = 54.3584 K, and (T - T₉₀) = (-0.61 ± 0.49) mK at T ₉₀ = 24.5561 K. The ITS-90 thermodynamic accuracy results of the present refractive index gas thermometry study agree with those previously reported by acoustic gas thermometry and dielectric constant gas thermometry.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it