Broader Geographic Sampling Increases Extent of Intermediate Host Specificity for a Trematode Parasite (Notocotylidae: Quinqueserialis quinqueserialis)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Knowledge of helminth life cycles is essential to understanding their host specificity, geographic distribution, and transmission. Many helminth life cycle descriptions are based on field collections in a limited part of the parasite's range. However, it is important to determine whether helminth life cycles and host specificity remain consistent across their geographic range so that we may better understand their life history and transmission ecology. Here, we investigated whether the life cycle of a widespread trematode, Quinqueserialis quinqueserialis (Notocotylidae) varies across its geographic range. Four species of planorbid snails; Gyraulus circumstriatus, Gyraulus crista, Planorbula sp., and Promenetus exacuous, were collected at 5 locations in Canada (3 in Manitoba, 2 in Northwest Territories). Snails and parasite larvae were morphologically and genetically identified to species. The total prevalence of Q. quinqueserialis infections in snail hosts among the 5 locations was 2.3% (n = 1,017). Three species of snails were infected with Q. quinqueserialis rediae: G. circumstriatus, G. crista, and P. exacuous. Two of the 3 species of snails were infected in central (Manitoba) and northern locations (Northwest Territories) within Canada, which indicates limited life cycle variation across a large geographic range. This is the first report of snails naturally infected with Q. quinqueserialis in Canada. These novel host records demonstrate that this trematode species is not as host-specific for first intermediate host species as previously described.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".